Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:55:09.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The rise and fall of typed sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Marcel Crabbé*
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain, Département de Philosophie, Place Mercier, 14, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, E-mail:crabbe@risp.ucl.ac.be

Abstract

We characterize the 3-stratiflable theorems of NF as a 3-stratifiable extension of NF3: and show that NF is equiconsistent with TT plus raising type axioms for sentences asserting the existence of some predicate over an atomic Boolean algebra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Boffa, M., A reduction of the theory of types, Set theory and hierarchy theory, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 619, 1977, pp. 95100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Boffa, M. and Crabbé, M., Les théorèmes 3-stratifiés de NF3, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris, série A, vol. 280 (1975), pp. 16571658.Google Scholar
[3]Crabbé, M., La prédicativité dans les théories Élémentaires, Logique et Analyse, vol. 35 (1976), pp. 255266.Google Scholar
[4]Crabbé, M., On the reduction of type theory, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 29 (1983), pp. 235237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Forster, Th., Set theory with a universal set. Exploring an untyped universe, second ed., Oxford Logic Guides, no. 31, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Grishin, V. N., The method of stratification in set theory, Ph. D. thesis, Moscow University, 1972, in Russian.Google Scholar
[7]Oswald, U., Fragmente von “New Foundations” und Typentheorie, Ph. D. thesis, ETH, Zürich, 1976.Google Scholar
[8]Specker, E., Typical ambiguity, Logic, methodology and the philosophy of science (Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A., editors), Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1962, pp. 116124.Google Scholar