Skip to main content
Log in

Extensions of dominance-based rough set approach in incomplete information system

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As one of the useful extensions of classical rough set approach, the dominance-based rough set approach has been successfully applied into multi-criteria decision problems. However, the traditional dominance-based rough set approach is only suitable for the condition attributes, which are positively related with classification analysis. To solve this problem, we propose an extension of the dominance-based rough set approach in incomplete information system by assuming the condition attributes, which are not only positively but also negatively related with classification analysis. Furthermore, by considering the existence of unknown values in incomplete information system, we present the concept of valued dominance relation, which shows the probability of an object is dominating another one with respect to the condition attributes. By using the valued dominance relation, the fuzzy dominance-based rough set models are also studied. A numerical example is employed to substantiate the conceptual arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pawlak, Z., Rough Set Theory and Its Applications to Data Analysis, Cybernetics and Systems, 1998, vol. 29, pp. 661–688.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlak, Z., Rough Sets and Intelligent Data Analysis, Information Sci., 2002, vol. 147, pp. 1–12.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Pawlak, Z. and Skowron, A., Rudiments of Rough Sets, Information Sci., 2007, vol. 177, pp. 3–27.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlak, Z. and Skowron, A., Rough Sets: Some Extensions, Information Sci., 2007, vol. 177, pp. 28–40.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak, Z. and Skowron, A., Rough Sets and Boolean Reasoning, Information Sci., 2007, vol. 177, pp. 41–73.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Pawlak, Z., Some Remarks on Conflict Analysis, Eur. J. Operational Res., 2005, vol. 166, pp. 649–654.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., Rough Approximation by Dominance Relations, Int. J. Intelligent Systems, 2002, vol. 17, pp. 153–171.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., Rough Sets Theory for Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Eur. J. Operational Res., 2002, vol. 129, pp. 1–47.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., and Slowinski, R., Handing Missing Values in Rough Set Analysis of Multiattribute and Multi-Criteria Decision Problems, in New Directions in Rough Sets, Data Mining and Granular-Soft Computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Zhong, N., Skowron, A., and Ohsuga, S., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999, vol. 1711, pp. 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blaszczynski, J., Greco, S., and Slowinski, R., Multi-Criteria Classification—A New Scheme for Application of Dominance-Based Decision Rules, Eur. J. Operational Res., 2007, vol. 181, pp. 1030–1044.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan, T.F., Liu, D.R., and Tzeng, G.H., Rough Set-Based Logics for Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Eur. J. Operational Res., 2007, vol. 182, pp. 340–355.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Greco, S., Inuiguchi, M., and Slowinski, R., Fuzzy Rough Sets and Multiple-Premise Gradual Decision Rules, Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 2006, vol. 41, pp. 179–211.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Kryszkiewicz, Rough Set Approach to Incomplete Information Systems, Information Sci., 1998, vol. 112, pp. 39–49.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Kryszkiewicz, Rules in Incomplete Information Systems, Information Sci., 1999, vol. 113, pp. 271–292.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Characteristic Relations for Incomplete Data: a Generalization of the Indiscemibility Relation, in Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Tsumoto, S., et al., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag; New York: Heidelberg, 2004, vol. 3066, pp. 244–253.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Data with Missing Attribute Values: Generalization of Indiscemibility Relation and Rule Reduction, Transactions on Rough Sets I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2004, vol. 3100.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grzymala-Busse, J.W. and Wang, A.Y., Modified Algorithms LEM1 and LEM2 for Rule Induction from Data with Missing Attribute Values, in Proc. Fifth Int. Workshop on Rough Sets and Soft Computing at the Third Joint Conf. on Information Sci., Research TrianglePark, NC, 1997, pp. 69–72.

  18. Grzymala-Busse, J.W., On the Unknown Attribute Values in Learning from Examples, in Proc. Sixth Int. Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Charlotte, North Carolina, October 16–19, 1991), Zbigniew, W. and Maria Z., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag; New York: Heidelberg, 1991, vol. 542, pp. 368–377.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Latkowski, R., Flexible Indiscernibility Relations for Missing Attribute Values, Fundamenta Informaticae, 2005, vol. 67, pp. 131–147.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, W.Z., Zhang, W.X., and Li, H.Z., Knowledge Acquisition in Incomplete Fuzzy Information Systems via the Rough Set Approach, Expert Systems, 2003, vol. 20, pp. 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stefanowski, J. and Tsoukia’s, A., On the Extension of Rough Sets under Incomplete Information, in New Directions in Rough Sets, Data Mining and Granular-Soft Computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Zhong, N., Skowron, A., and Ohsuga, S., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999, vol. 1711, pp. 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stefanowski, J. and Tsoukia’s, A., Incomplete Information Tables and Rough Classification, Computational Intelligence, 2001, vol. 17, pp. 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung, Y. and Li, D.Y., Maximal Consistent Block Technique for Rule Acquisition in Incomplete Information Systems, Information Sci., 2003, vol. 115, pp. 85–106.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Leung, Y., Wu, W.Z., and Zhang, W.X., Knowledge Acquisition in Incomplete Information Systems: a Rough Set Approach, Eur. J. Operational Res., 2006, vol. 168, pp. 164–180.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Shao, M.W. and Zhang, W.X., Dominance Relation and Rules in an Incomplete Ordered Information System, Int. J. Intelligent Systems, 2005, vol. 20, pp. 13–27.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lihua Wei.

Additional information

The text was submitted in English by the authors.

About this article

Cite this article

Wei, L., Tang, Z., Wang, R. et al. Extensions of dominance-based rough set approach in incomplete information system. Aut. Conrol Comp. Sci. 42, 255–263 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411608050040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411608050040

Keywords

Navigation