Skip to main content
Log in

On the role of subjective assessments in IPTV quality configuration

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is currently no method for quality measurement suitable for the resolution of disputes between IPTV operators and governing regulators; the G.107 ITU and G.1070 ITU standards employ too many objective measurements, which complicates their application. The appropriateness of the development of practical techniques for collecting subjective quality evaluations of the IPTV themselves is shown; such factors can serve as a basis for solving the disputes mentioned. The problem of simplifying the ITU G.107 and ITU G.1070 standards by multivariate statistical analysis and selection of the most informative objective quality indicators is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schneps-Schneppe, M.A., On the global index of the communication quality for QoS, QoE, and SLA: New challenges, Autom. Cont. Compt. Sci., 2013, vol. 47, pp. 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schneps-Schneppe, M.A. and Enyukov, I., Internet access service level agreement-a challenge to teletraffic engineering, Proc. Specialist Seminar on Access Networks and Systems (ITC-14), Girona, 2001, pp. 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schneps-Schneppe, M.A. and Iversen, V.B., Service level agreement as an issue of teletraffic, Proc. 18th Int. Teletr. Congress, Berlin, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. http://docbox.etsi.org/Workshop/2012/201211-STQWORKSHOP/S00-INTRO/ETSISTQWORK-Kamcke.pdf

  5. ETSI ES 202 718 Speech and Multimedia Transmission Quality (STQ); Transmission Requirements for IP-based Narrowband and Wideband Home Gateways, 2011.

  6. ATIS-0800008. Quality of Service Metrics for Linear (Broadcast) IPTV.

  7. ITU-T G.107. The E-Model: A Computational Model for Use in Transmission Planning, 2011.

  8. ITU-T G.1070 Multimedia Quality of Service and Performance — Generic and User-Related Aspects. Opinion Model for Video-Telephony Applications, 2012.

  9. Joskowicz, J., et al., Comparison of parametric models for video quality estimation, Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, 2012, pp. 1–7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamagishi, K. and Hayashi, T., QRP 08-1: Opinion Model for Estimating Video Quality of Videophone Services, GLOBECOM, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Welch, J. and Clark, J., A Proposed Media Delivery Index (MDI), IETF RFC 4445, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Usluga IP-televideniya. Trebovaniya k parametram kachestva i metody kontrolya.” Predvaritel’nyi Gosudarstvennyi standart Respubliki Belorus’, (Service of IP-Television. Requirements to Quality Parameters and Control Methods, Preliminary State Standard of Republic Belarus), 2012.

  13. Yamagishi, K. and Hayashi, T., Verification of video quality opinion model for videophone services, Proc. 2nd ISCA/DEGA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems, 2006, pp.143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pauliks, R., Belahs, K., and Tretjaks, K., Subjective video quality assessment methods, Space Res. Rev., 2013, vol. 2, pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ITU BT.500. Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, 2009.

  16. ITU P.910. Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications, 2008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Schneps-Schneppe.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © M.A. Schneps-Schneppe, R. Pauliks, 2014, published in Avtomatika i Vychislitel’naya Tekhnika, 2014, No. 1, pp. 36–48.

About this article

Cite this article

Schneps-Schneppe, M.A., Pauliks, R. On the role of subjective assessments in IPTV quality configuration. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 48, 25–36 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411614010052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411614010052

Keywords

Navigation