Skip to main content
Log in

Services recommended trust algorithm based on cloud model attributes weighted clustering

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many different cloud services available, each with different offerings and standards of quality. Choosing a credible and reliable service has become a key issue. To address the shortcomings of existing evaluation methods, we propose a service clustering method based on weighted cloud model attributes. We calculate user-rating similarity with the weighted Pearson correlation coefficient method based on service clustering, and then compute user similarity combined with the user service selection index weight. This method allows us to determine the nearest neighbors. Finally, we obtain the recommended trust of the service for the target user through the recommendation trust algorithm. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can more accurately calculate service recommended trust. This method meets the demand of users in terms of service trust, and it improves the success rate of user service selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shang, G., Wang, Z.P., Liu, Q.B., et al., Towards an accurate evaluation of quality of cloud service in serviceoriented cloud computing, J. Intell. Manuf., 2014, vol. 25, no. 2.

  2. Wu, M.L., Chang, C.H., and Liu, R.Z., Integrating content-based filtering with collaborative filtering using coclustering with augmented matrices, Expert Syst. Appl., 2014, vol. 41, no. 6.

  3. Cao, J., Zeng, G.S., and Jiang, H.W., Service trust cloud environment perception of the trusted dynamic scheduling method, J. Commun., 2014, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, G.W., Li, D.Y., and Li, P., Collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on cloud model, J. Software, 2007, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2405–2409.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed, S.I. and Sharmin, M., A trust based secure service discovery (TSSD) model for pervasive computing, J. Comput. Commun., 2008, vol. 31, no. 18, pp. 4281–4293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh, S. and Chand, D., Trust evaluation in cloud based on friends and third party’s recommendation, Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS), 2014, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Das, A. and Islam, M.M., Secured trust: A dynamic trust computation model for secured communication in multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., 2012, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, S.G., Sun, Q.B., and Yang, F.C., In the web service selection credibility evaluation method, J. Software, 2012, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1350–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, G. and Gui, X.L., Selecting a trust computing for transaction nodes in online social networks, Chin. J. Comput., 2013, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 368–383.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng, A.L., Zhu, Y.Y., and Shi, B.L., Collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on project score predicts, J. Software, 2003, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1621–1628.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Z.Y. and Wang, R.C., The dynamic security of P2P e-commerce environment trust management model, J. Commun., 2011, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brandic, I., Dustdar, S., Anstett, T., et al., Compliant cloud computing (C3): Architecture and language support for user-driven compliance management in clouds, Proceedings of the IEEE Cloud Computing, 2010, pp. 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malik, Z. and Buguettaya, A., RATEWeb: Reputation assessment for trust establishment among web service, VLDB J., 2012, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 885–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Masri, E. and Mahmoud, Q.H., Toward quality-driven web service discovery, ITProf., 2008, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 24–28.

  15. Li Dy, Artificial Intelligence with Uncertainty, Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2005, pp. 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li Dy and Liu Cy, Study on the universality of the normal cloud model, Eng. Sci., 2004, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 28–34.

  17. Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., and Konstan, J., Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms, Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, New York, 2001, pp. 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shardanand, U. and Maes, P., Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating ‘Word of Mouth,’ Proceeding of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1995, pp. 210–217.

  19. Zhu, R., Wang, H.M., and Feng, D.W., Based on the preference of credible service is recommended, J. Commun., 2011, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 852–864.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao, G., Wu, L.Q., Zhang, Y.M., et al., A web service trust evaluation approach based on collaborative frequency clustering, J. Zhejiang Univ. Technol., 2014, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-yong Yu.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Zy., Wang, Jd., Zhang, Hw. et al. Services recommended trust algorithm based on cloud model attributes weighted clustering. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 50, 260–270 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411616040106

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411616040106

Keywords

Navigation