Skip to main content
Log in

Robustness Analysis of Modified Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Small UAVs

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work presented in this research focuses on the design of a robust nonlinear flight control system for a small fixed-wing UAV against uncertainties and external disturbances. Toward this objective, an integrated UAV waypoints guidance scheme based on Carrot Chasing guidance law (CC) is adopted. The designed attitude angles guidance law is applied to the flight control loop. Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (NDI) awards the flight control system researchers a straight forward method of deriving control laws for nonlinear systems. The control inputs are used to eliminate unwanted terms in the equations of motion using negative feedback of these terms. However precise dynamic models may not be available and that leads to system instability in the presence of external disturbances or model uncertainties. Therefore a modified incremental dynamic inversion (MINDI) is presented to compensate the model uncertainties and increase robustness and system behavior when compared to incremental NDI. Simulation results showed that the MINDI flight control system is robust against wind disturbances and model mismatch which leads to superior path following performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mothes, F., Trajectory planning in time-varying adverse weather for fixed-wing aircraft using robust model predictive control, Aerospace, 2019, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaminer, I., Hallberg, E., Silvestre, C., and Pascoal, A., Trajectory tracking for autonomous vehicles: An integrated approach to guidance and control, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1998, vol. 21, no. 1.

  3. Sujit, P., Saripalli, B., and Sousa, S., Unmanned aerial vehicle path following: A survey and analysis of algorithms for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles, IEEE Control Syst., 2014, vol. 34, pp. 42–59.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Enomoto, K., Yamasaki, T., Takano, H., and Baba, Y., Guidance and control system design for chase UAV, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrosino, G., Ariola, M., and Ciniglio, U., Path generation and tracking in 3-D for UAVs, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2009, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 980–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehab, S., Zhang, W., and Mohsen, A., Design and analysis of a robust UAV flight guidance and control system based on a modified nonlinear dynamic inversion, Appl. Sci., 2019, vol. 9, no. 17, p. 3600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horn, J.F., Non-linear dynamic inversion control design for rotorcraft, Aerospace, 2019, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sujit, P., Saripalli, B., and Sousa, S., An evaluation of UAV path following algorithms, Control Conference, 2013.

  9. Rhee, I., Park, S., and Ryoo, C., A tight path following algorithm of an UAS based on PID control, SICE Conference, 2010.

  10. Cunha, R., Silvestre, C., and Pascoal, A., A path following controller for model-scale helicopters, European Control Conference, 2015.

  11. Safwat, E., Zhang, W., Wu, M., et al., Robust path following controller for unmanned aerial vehicle based on carrot chasing guidance law using dynamic inversion, 2018 18th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 2018, pp. 1444–1450.

  12. Kamal, A.M., Bayoumy, A.M., and Elshabka, A.M., Modeling and flight simulation of unmanned aerial vehicle enhanced with fine tuning, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 51, pp. 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beard, R.W. and Mclain, T.W., Small Unmanned Aircraft:Theory and Practice, 2012.

  14. Niu, H., Yu, L., Savvaris, A., and Tsourdos, A., Efficient path following algorithm for unmanned surface vehicle, OCEANS 2016, Shanghai, 2016.

  15. Slotine, J., Li, W., and Hall, P., Applied Nonlinear Control, Pearson Schweiz Ag., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kamal, A.M., Bayoumy, A.M., and Elshabka, A.M., Modeling and flight simulation of unmanned aerial vehicle enhanced with fine tuning, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 51, pp. 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seyedipour, S.H., Jegarkandi, M.F., and Shamaghdari, S., Nonlinear integrated guidance and control based on adaptive backstepping scheme, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 2017, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 415–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Jinglong, Zhang Weiguo, and Liu Xiaoxiong, Gust response stabilization for rigid aircraft with multi-control-effectors based on a novel integrated control scheme, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2018, vol. 79, pp. 625–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, Q., Wang, X., and Yang, J., Trajectory-following guidance based on a virtual target and an angle constraint, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 87, pp. 448–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali, S.U., Samar, R., and Shah, M.Z., Lateral guidance and control of UAVs using second-order sliding modes, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 49, pp. 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, J., Chen, S., and Li, C., Adaptive control of underactuated flight vehicles with moving mass, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 85, pp. 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su, Z., Li, C., and Wang, H., Barrier Lyapunov function-based robust flight control for the ultra-low altitude airdrop under airflow disturbances, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 84, pp. 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Flight Control and Simulation Technology with the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61573286 and 61374032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehab Safwat.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehab Safwat, Zhang, W., Kamel, A. et al. Robustness Analysis of Modified Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Small UAVs. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 54, 128–138 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411620020078

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411620020078

Keywords:

Navigation