Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Four Methods of Checking the Integrity of Transmitted Message Blocks

  • Published:
Automatic Control and Computer Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

We consider the quantity \(\alpha \), which is the error probability in each of four data block integrity checking methods: electronic signature, cyclic redundancy code, checksums in a vector space over a field of two elements, and checksums in a ring of integers modulo 2k, where k is the length of the check code. Asymptotic representations for α are compared for a small value of p-distortion of a transmitted binary symbol and a large volume n of a transmitted data block. For the above integrity checking methods, the values of the main terms of the asymptotic expansion of α under the condition “np tends to zero for n tending to infinity” are obtained and calculated as an example for the parameters of TCP protocol segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Vainshtein, L.A. and Zubakov, V.D., Vydelenie signalov na fone sluchainykh pomekh (Separation of Signals at the Noise Background), Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio, 1960.

  2. Baranov, A.P. and Baranov, P.A., Models of the formation of CRC values and monitoring sums under the conditions of multiple distortions, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2017, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 959–964.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411617080065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baranov, A.P. and Baranov, P.A., Assessment of CRC error probability at minor distortion of information, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2016, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 765–772.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411616080058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baranov, A.P. and Baranov, P.A., Estimating the probability of a checksum error in a message, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2019, vol. 53, pp. 874–878.https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411619080066

  5. Baranov, A.P. and Baranov, P.A., Estimating the probability of a checksum error in a message, Autom. Control Comput. Sci., 2019, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 874–878.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411619080066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. GOST R (State Standard) MEK 870–5–1–95: Telemechanic Devices and Systems, Part 5: Transmission Protocols, Section 1: Formats of Transferred Frames, 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. Baranov.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by O. Pismenov

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baranov, P.A. Comparison of Four Methods of Checking the Integrity of Transmitted Message Blocks. Aut. Control Comp. Sci. 55, 918–923 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411621080058

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411621080058

Keywords:

Navigation