A Relationship Between Generalized Davenport-Schinzel Sequences and Interval Chains
Keywords:
alternations, formations, generalized Davenport-Schinzel sequences, interval chains, inverse Ackermann functions, permutations
Abstract
Let an (r,s)-formation be a concatenation of s permutations of r distinct letters, and let a block of a sequence be a subsequence of consecutive distinct letters. A k-chain on [1,m] is a sequence of k consecutive, disjoint, nonempty intervals of the form [a0,a1][a1+1,a2]…[ak−1+1,ak] for integers 1≤a0≤a1<…<ak≤m, and an s-tuple is a set of s distinct integers. An s-tuple stabs an interval chain if each element of the s-tuple is in a different interval of the chain. Alon et al. (2008) observed similarities between bounds for interval chains and Davenport-Schinzel sequences, but did not identify the cause.We show for all r≥1 and 1≤s≤k≤m that the maximum number of distinct letters in any sequence S on m+1 blocks avoiding every (r,s+1)-formation such that every letter in S occurs at least k+1 times is the same as the maximum size of a collection X of (not necessarily distinct) k-chains on [1,m] so that there do not exist r elements of X all stabbed by the same s-tuple.
Let Ds,k(m) be the maximum number of distinct letters in any sequence which can be partitioned into m blocks, has at least k occurrences of every letter, and has no subsequence forming an alternation of length s. Nivasch (2010) proved that D5,2d+1(m)=Θ(mαd(m)) for all fixed d≥2. We show that D_{s+1, s}(m) = \binom{m- \lceil \frac{s}{2} \rceil}{\lfloor \frac{s}{2} \rfloor} for all s \geq 2. We also prove new lower bounds which imply that D_{5, 6}(m) = \Theta(m \log \log m) and D_{5, 2d+2}(m) = \Theta(m \alpha_{d}(m)) for all fixed d \geq 3.