Reference Hub9
The Event Study Method in Logistics Research: Overview and a Critical Analysis

The Event Study Method in Logistics Research: Overview and a Critical Analysis

Lincoln C. Wood, Jason X. Wang
Copyright: © 2018 |Volume: 8 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 23
ISSN: 1947-9573|EISSN: 1947-9581|EISBN13: 9781522544920|DOI: 10.4018/IJAL.2018010104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Wood, Lincoln C., and Jason X. Wang. "The Event Study Method in Logistics Research: Overview and a Critical Analysis." IJAL vol.8, no.1 2018: pp.57-79. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAL.2018010104

APA

Wood, L. C. & Wang, J. X. (2018). The Event Study Method in Logistics Research: Overview and a Critical Analysis. International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL), 8(1), 57-79. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAL.2018010104

Chicago

Wood, Lincoln C., and Jason X. Wang. "The Event Study Method in Logistics Research: Overview and a Critical Analysis," International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL) 8, no.1: 57-79. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAL.2018010104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Logistics researchers often want to understand how particular management changes or external factors influence a firm. While this can be accomplished using operational or survey data, the authors outline an alternative approach using the event study method where inferences are made with the estimated magnitude and direction of abnormal returns. The calculated abnormal returns can be used as a dependent variable in a cross-sectional regression to understand which managerial decisions may affect these outcomes. As the method remains little used by logistics researchers, the authors outline key assumptions and design considerations. They review recent articles and provide suggestions for logistics researchers improve the rigor of their research designs. This article aims to provide an overview of the method for logistics and supply chain researchers with a focus on developing the capability to design an effective study and to evaluate research articles to assess methodological weaknesses that may lead to untrustworthy results.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.