Investigating the Relationship Between Confucianism and Leadership: A Comparative Study of University Faculty

Investigating the Relationship Between Confucianism and Leadership: A Comparative Study of University Faculty

Andrew Schenck
Copyright: © 2018 |Volume: 9 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 12
ISSN: 1947-8607|EISSN: 1947-878X|EISBN13: 9781522544265|DOI: 10.4018/IJAVET.2018070104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Schenck, Andrew. "Investigating the Relationship Between Confucianism and Leadership: A Comparative Study of University Faculty." IJAVET vol.9, no.3 2018: pp.35-46. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2018070104

APA

Schenck, A. (2018). Investigating the Relationship Between Confucianism and Leadership: A Comparative Study of University Faculty. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET), 9(3), 35-46. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2018070104

Chicago

Schenck, Andrew. "Investigating the Relationship Between Confucianism and Leadership: A Comparative Study of University Faculty," International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET) 9, no.3: 35-46. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2018070104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This article describes how due to the potential impact of cultural factors on leadership, further research of foreign contexts is needed. A study was designed to examine relationships between Confucian values and leadership preferences in a South Korean context. First, the Vannsimpco Leadership Survey (VLS) was given to faculty from both a South Korean and American university. Responses from each group were then averaged by leadership style and statistically compared using the Mann-Whitney U formula. Results revealed significantly higher Korean preferences for autocratic-transformational (U = 365.50, p < .001) autocratic-transactional (U = 453.00, p < .001), and transactional leadership (U = 613.50, p < .05). In contrast to Korean faculty, American respondents significantly preferred transformational leadership (U = 601.00, p < .05). Empirical analysis suggests that hybrid leadership styles are needed in South Korea to address complex interdependent Confucian values, which support both autocratic and democratic social layers.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.