Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
A Comparative Evaluation of Mining Techniques to Detect Malicious Node in Wireless Sensor Networks

A Comparative Evaluation of Mining Techniques to Detect Malicious Node in Wireless Sensor Networks

Mandeep Singh, Navjyot Kaur, Amandeep Kaur, Gaurav Pushkarna
Copyright: © 2017 |Volume: 7 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 12
ISSN: 1947-3435|EISSN: 1947-3443|EISBN13: 9781522514060|DOI: 10.4018/IJCWT.2017040103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Singh, Mandeep, et al. "A Comparative Evaluation of Mining Techniques to Detect Malicious Node in Wireless Sensor Networks." IJCWT vol.7, no.2 2017: pp.42-53. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCWT.2017040103

APA

Singh, M., Kaur, N., Kaur, A., & Pushkarna, G. (2017). A Comparative Evaluation of Mining Techniques to Detect Malicious Node in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism (IJCWT), 7(2), 42-53. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCWT.2017040103

Chicago

Singh, Mandeep, et al. "A Comparative Evaluation of Mining Techniques to Detect Malicious Node in Wireless Sensor Networks," International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism (IJCWT) 7, no.2: 42-53. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCWT.2017040103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks have gained attention over the last few years and have significant applications for example remote supervising and target watching. They can communicate with each other though wireless interface and configure a network. Wireless sensor networks are often deployed in an unfriendly location and most of time it works without human management; individual node may possibly be compromised by the adversary due to some constraints. In this manner, the security of a wireless sensor network is critical. This work will focus on evaluation of mining techniques that can be used to find malicious nodes. The detection mechanisms provide the accuracy of the classification using different algorithm to detect the malicious node. Pragmatically the detection accuracy of J48 is 99.17%, Random Forest is 80.83%, NF Tree is 81.67% and BF Tree is 72.33%. J48 have very high detection accuracy as compared with BF Tree, NF Tree Random Forest.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.