Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants

Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants

Younsook Yeo, Changsoo Sohn
Copyright: © 2021 |Volume: 13 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 18
ISSN: 1937-9633|EISSN: 1937-9641|EISBN13: 9781799860204|DOI: 10.4018/IJEA.2021010102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Yeo, Younsook, and Changsoo Sohn. "Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants." IJEA vol.13, no.1 2021: pp.18-35. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEA.2021010102

APA

Yeo, Y. & Sohn, C. (2021). Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 13(1), 18-35. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEA.2021010102

Chicago

Yeo, Younsook, and Changsoo Sohn. "Intention-Behavior Gap in the Use of Personal Health Records (PHRs): Investigation of Social Determinants," International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA) 13, no.1: 18-35. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEA.2021010102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This paper examined an intention-behavior gap in individuals' personal health records (PHRs) adoption behaviors using Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB) that incorporates social factors. Using structural equation modeling, the authors analyze the health information national trends survey data. The research found that all of the constructs, except for perceived behavioral control (PBC), shape intentions to use PHRs. However, PBC only predicts actual use. Individuals who have higher intentions tend to believe that healthcare providers should be able to share their patients' PHRs with other professionals and that scientists should be able to review de-identified patient PHRs. Individuals who perceive that a need exists for privacy control over their own health information tend to have higher intentions. The moderating social factors between intentions and actual behaviors are healthcare accessibility and being female, while education (positively) and employment (negatively) have significant relationships with actual use of, but not with intentions to use, PHRs. Future research needs to explicate why the moderating effect revolves around gender.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.