Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub3
Evaluation of an Academic and Student Administration System in its Post-Implementation Phase: A Case Study at the University of Botswana

Evaluation of an Academic and Student Administration System in its Post-Implementation Phase: A Case Study at the University of Botswana

Pelleth Y. Thomas, Rebana N. Mmereki, Rudolph L. Boy
Copyright: © 2018 |Volume: 14 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 12
ISSN: 1548-1115|EISSN: 1548-1123|EISBN13: 9781522542704|DOI: 10.4018/IJEIS.2018070104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Thomas, Pelleth Y., et al. "Evaluation of an Academic and Student Administration System in its Post-Implementation Phase: A Case Study at the University of Botswana." IJEIS vol.14, no.3 2018: pp.79-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2018070104

APA

Thomas, P. Y., Mmereki, R. N., & Boy, R. L. (2018). Evaluation of an Academic and Student Administration System in its Post-Implementation Phase: A Case Study at the University of Botswana. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 14(3), 79-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2018070104

Chicago

Thomas, Pelleth Y., Rebana N. Mmereki, and Rudolph L. Boy. "Evaluation of an Academic and Student Administration System in its Post-Implementation Phase: A Case Study at the University of Botswana," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS) 14, no.3: 79-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2018070104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

The article seeks to evaluate the Academic and Student Administration System (ASAS) at the University of Botswana (UB) in order to determine whether the system was performing successfully in its post-implementation phase. It was guided by the Delone and Mclean IS success evaluation model. Three independent ASAS quality variables and one dependent variable (user satisfaction) were included in the study Model. The study also examined if the Model was appropriate for evaluating ASAS in the UB context. The study used quantitative approaches that included a questionnaire, and statistical tools such as reliability test, descriptive statistics, and paired samples t-test. The study found that: (1) users were satisfied with the ASAS performance; however, they felt that there was still room for improvement; (2) the Model was found to be credible for evaluating ASAS in the UB context. Areas that needed improvement were identified and recommendations were made on how to address them.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.