Reference Hub5
Measuring Online Deliberation in Local Politics: An Empirical Analysis of the 2011 Zurich City Debate

Measuring Online Deliberation in Local Politics: An Empirical Analysis of the 2011 Zurich City Debate

Ulrike Klinger, Uta Russmann
Copyright: © 2014 |Volume: 5 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 17
ISSN: 1947-9131|EISSN: 1947-914X|EISBN13: 9781466654112|DOI: 10.4018/ijep.2014010104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Klinger, Ulrike, and Uta Russmann. "Measuring Online Deliberation in Local Politics: An Empirical Analysis of the 2011 Zurich City Debate." IJEP vol.5, no.1 2014: pp.61-77. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014010104

APA

Klinger, U. & Russmann, U. (2014). Measuring Online Deliberation in Local Politics: An Empirical Analysis of the 2011 Zurich City Debate. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 5(1), 61-77. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014010104

Chicago

Klinger, Ulrike, and Uta Russmann. "Measuring Online Deliberation in Local Politics: An Empirical Analysis of the 2011 Zurich City Debate," International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP) 5, no.1: 61-77. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijep.2014010104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Administrations increasingly use the internet to improve citizens' participation in political processes. While research on online political communication and e-democracy is growing, we still have little empirical evidence on the quality of online participation and deliberation processes. This paper focuses on an online local deliberation process, the 2011 Zurich City Debate, and seeks to investigate the specific quality of such online public communication. By building an index of a quality of understanding (IQU), the authors analyse 1.991 postings that participants have contributed in five thematic debates on local political issues. Five indicators were defined: statement of reasons, proposals for solutions, respect, doubts, and reciprocity. The authors conclude that participants have respectfully voiced opinions, that in two fora half of the postings were reciprocal, i.e. people exchanged views and commented on each other. However, the data gives the impression of a polite and reciprocal debate, but without much argumentation, propositions or doubts.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.