Women Can't Win: Gender Irony and the E-Politics of The Biggest Loser

Women Can't Win: Gender Irony and the E-Politics of The Biggest Loser

Michael S. Bruner, Karissa Valine, Berenice Ceja
Copyright: © 2016 |Volume: 7 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 21
ISSN: 1947-9131|EISSN: 1947-914X|EISBN13: 9781466691490|DOI: 10.4018/IJEP.2016040102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Bruner, Michael S., et al. "Women Can't Win: Gender Irony and the E-Politics of The Biggest Loser." IJEP vol.7, no.2 2016: pp.16-36. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2016040102

APA

Bruner, M. S., Valine, K., & Ceja, B. (2016). Women Can't Win: Gender Irony and the E-Politics of The Biggest Loser. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 7(2), 16-36. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2016040102

Chicago

Bruner, Michael S., Karissa Valine, and Berenice Ceja. "Women Can't Win: Gender Irony and the E-Politics of The Biggest Loser," International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP) 7, no.2: 16-36. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2016040102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This essay employs irony as a tool to make clearer the workings of one form of the e-politics of food, namely, the structural food oppression linked to the weight and shape of the female body. Arguing that the e-politics of the weight and shape of the female body is one of the most important incarnations of the e-politics of food and one of the most vigorously contested, this study examines the construction of the assumptions, the ideals, and the rules with which women must contend. The case of Rachel Frederickson, the oft-attacked winner of The Biggest Loser (2014), serves as the focus of the study. The critical rhetorical analysis finds some support for the Women Can't Win thesis. Finally, the authors offers some constructive suggestions for helping to escape the Catch-22 of fat-shaming/skinny shaming.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.