Reference Hub8
Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning

Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning

Janne Berg
Copyright: © 2017 |Volume: 8 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 16
ISSN: 1947-9131|EISSN: 1947-914X|EISBN13: 9781522513452|DOI: 10.4018/IJEP.2017010102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Berg, Janne. "Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning." IJEP vol.8, no.1 2017: pp.14-29. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2017010102

APA

Berg, J. (2017). Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning. International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 8(1), 14-29. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2017010102

Chicago

Berg, Janne. "Political Participation in the Form of Online Petitions: A Comparison of Formal and Informal Petitioning," International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP) 8, no.1: 14-29. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2017010102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This paper contributes to the field of e-participation by studying e-petitioning on both formal and informal petition bodies. The aim is to contribute to the understanding of the features of formal and informal e-petition platforms as well as the characteristics of the e-petitions. A formal (kansalaisaloite.fi) and an informal e-petition platform (adressit.com) in Finland were compared using quantitative content analysis. By examining the differences between formal and informal platforms, this paper sheds light over citizens' political behavior in the form of online petitioning. The varying formality of the platforms was reflected in their features and e-petitioning processes. Furthermore, formal and informal e-petitions differed regarding their initiators, text length, topics, preparation quality, rationality, affectivity and connections to other types of media. E-petitions on the formal platform are better prepared, show more signs of rational argumentation, and more often concern controversial topics.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.