Realistic versus Schematic Interactive Visualizations for Learning Surveying Practices: A Comparative Study

Realistic versus Schematic Interactive Visualizations for Learning Surveying Practices: A Comparative Study

Hazar Dib, Nicoletta Adamo-Villani, Stephen Garver
Copyright: © 2014 |Volume: 10 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 13
ISSN: 1550-1876|EISSN: 1550-1337|EISBN13: 9781466654662|DOI: 10.4018/ijicte.2014040106
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Dib, Hazar, et al. "Realistic versus Schematic Interactive Visualizations for Learning Surveying Practices: A Comparative Study." IJICTE vol.10, no.2 2014: pp.62-74. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014040106

APA

Dib, H., Adamo-Villani, N., & Garver, S. (2014). Realistic versus Schematic Interactive Visualizations for Learning Surveying Practices: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 10(2), 62-74. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014040106

Chicago

Dib, Hazar, Nicoletta Adamo-Villani, and Stephen Garver. "Realistic versus Schematic Interactive Visualizations for Learning Surveying Practices: A Comparative Study," International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE) 10, no.2: 62-74. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014040106

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Many benefits have been claimed for visualizations, a general assumption being that learning is facilitated. However, several researchers argue that little is known about the cognitive value of graphical representations, be they schematic visualizations, such as diagrams or more realistic, such as virtual reality. The study reported in the paper investigated whether the type of visualization (schematic versus realistic) has an effect on undergraduate students' learning of surveying practices (specifically, ‘chaining'). The study compared two interactive virtual learning environments, one containing realistic visualizations of terrains and instruments, and one containing schematic graphical representations. Results of an experiment with 62 students show that there were not significant differences in learning between students who were exposed and interacted with the realistic visualizations versus those who interacted with the schematic ones.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.