Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery

Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery

Peter William Stonebraker, Gezinus J. Hidding
Copyright: © 2020 |Volume: 10 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 13
ISSN: 2155-6873|EISSN: 2155-6881|EISBN13: 9781799807452|DOI: 10.4018/IJOPCD.2020070105
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Stonebraker, Peter William, and Gezinus J. Hidding. "Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery." IJOPCD vol.10, no.3 2020: pp.78-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2020070105

APA

Stonebraker, P. W. & Hidding, G. J. (2020). Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 10(3), 78-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2020070105

Chicago

Stonebraker, Peter William, and Gezinus J. Hidding. "Comparing Traditional and Online Instructional Delivery," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD) 10, no.3: 78-90. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2020070105

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This paper first describes the dilemma of online pedagogies. Then it reviews prior research in business courses about the outcomes of online instruction compared with traditional methods. Prior research suffers from various research methodology issues that are categorized. Subsequently, a pre/poststudy of over 200 undergraduate business statistics students is presented using one-sample and two-population tests to address the learning outcomes of instructional delivery. Overall, based on this sound research design, online instructional delivery resulted in learning outcomes, measured on three dimensions, that were found to be statistically equivalent to those of traditional delivery.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.