Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Higher and Engineering Education Quality Assurance: Past, Present, and Future

Higher and Engineering Education Quality Assurance: Past, Present, and Future

Peter J. Gray
Copyright: © 2011 |Volume: 1 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 14
ISSN: 2155-496X|EISSN: 2155-4978|EISBN13: 9781613508930|DOI: 10.4018/ijqaete.2011010101
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Gray, Peter J. "Higher and Engineering Education Quality Assurance: Past, Present, and Future." IJQAETE vol.1, no.1 2011: pp.1-14. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2011010101

APA

Gray, P. J. (2011). Higher and Engineering Education Quality Assurance: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE), 1(1), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2011010101

Chicago

Gray, Peter J. "Higher and Engineering Education Quality Assurance: Past, Present, and Future," International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) 1, no.1: 1-14. http://doi.org/10.4018/ijqaete.2011010101

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Quality assurance has been defined as a means of “control over the standards, delivery, and validation of higher education” (Brock, 2007, p. 25). Over the past twenty-five years (one could say 2500 years) calls for quality assurance have caused tension inside and with regards to the outcomes of higher education. These tensions stem from differing purposes, perceptions, and processes for quality assurance on the part of the groups that compete to control these elements. In essence, it is a matter of language and power (Ewell, 1989), that is, whoever defines the language of quality assurance purposes, perceptions, and processes has the power to control higher education. Inside higher education those in different disciplines may have quite divergent views of quality assurance. Often these views are divided along the lines of the sciences and humanities, as characterized by Snow (1961). In addition, the more applied or profession-oriented disciplines, such as engineering, business, health professions, and teacher education, have their own expectations related to the standards, delivery, and validation of higher education. It is often the case that faculty and administrative cultures within an institution have differing views related to purposes, perceptions, and processes of quality assurance.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.