Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub10
The Use of Software Tools in Linked Data Publication and Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review

The Use of Software Tools in Linked Data Publication and Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review

Armando Barbosa, Ig Ibert Bittencourt, Sean Wolfgand Matsui Siqueira, Rafael de Amorim Silva, Ivo Calado
Copyright: © 2017 |Volume: 13 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 21
ISSN: 1552-6283|EISSN: 1552-6291|EISBN13: 9781522511601|DOI: 10.4018/IJSWIS.2017100104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Barbosa, Armando, et al. "The Use of Software Tools in Linked Data Publication and Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review." IJSWIS vol.13, no.4 2017: pp.68-88. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.2017100104

APA

Barbosa, A., Bittencourt, I. I., Siqueira, S. W., Silva, R. D., & Calado, I. (2017). The Use of Software Tools in Linked Data Publication and Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 13(4), 68-88. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.2017100104

Chicago

Barbosa, Armando, et al. "The Use of Software Tools in Linked Data Publication and Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 13, no.4: 68-88. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.2017100104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

To reduce the complexity intrinsic to LD manipulation, software tools are used to publish or consume data associated to LD activities. However, few developers have a broad understanding of how software tools may be used in publication or consumption of Linked Data. The goal of this work is to investigate the use of software tools in Linked Data publication and consumption processes. More specifically, understanding how these software tools are related to process of publication or consumption of LD. In order to meet their goal, the authors conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify the studies on the use of software tools in these processes. The SLR gathered 6473 studies, of which only 80 studies remained for final analysis (1.25% of the original sample). The highlights of the study are: (1) initial steps of the publication process are fairly supported by the software tools; (2) Non-RDF serialization is fairly supported in publication and consumptions process by the software tools; and (3) there are non-supported steps in consumption and publication processes by the tools.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.