Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub2
Conflicts, Compromises, and Political Decisions: Methodological Challenges of Enterprise-Wide E-Business Architecture Creation

Conflicts, Compromises, and Political Decisions: Methodological Challenges of Enterprise-Wide E-Business Architecture Creation

Kari Smolander, Matti Rossi
Copyright: © 2009 |Volume: 5 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 22
ISSN: 1548-1115|EISSN: 1548-1123|ISSN: 1548-1115|EISBN13: 9781615202690|EISSN: 1548-1123|DOI: 10.4018/jeis.2009040104
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Smolander, Kari, and Matti Rossi. "Conflicts, Compromises, and Political Decisions: Methodological Challenges of Enterprise-Wide E-Business Architecture Creation." IJEIS vol.5, no.2 2009: pp.49-70. http://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2009040104

APA

Smolander, K. & Rossi, M. (2009). Conflicts, Compromises, and Political Decisions: Methodological Challenges of Enterprise-Wide E-Business Architecture Creation. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 5(2), 49-70. http://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2009040104

Chicago

Smolander, Kari, and Matti Rossi. "Conflicts, Compromises, and Political Decisions: Methodological Challenges of Enterprise-Wide E-Business Architecture Creation," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS) 5, no.2: 49-70. http://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2009040104

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This article describes the architecture development process in an international ICT company, which is building a comprehensive e-business system for its customers. The implementation includes the integration of data and legacy systems from independent business units and the construction of a uniform Web-based customer interface. We followed the early process of architecture analysis and definition over a year. The research focuses on the creation of e-business architecture and observes that instead of guided by a prescribed method, the architecture emerges through somewhat non-deliberate actions obliged by the situation and its constraints, conflicts, compromises, and political decisions. The interview-based qualitative data is analyzed using grounded theory and a coherent story explaining the situation and its forces is extracted. Conclusions are drawn from the observations and possibilities and weaknesses of the support that UML and RUP provide for the process are pointed out.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.