Reference Hub1
Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays

Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays

Xiaobin Shen, Andrew Vande Moere, Peter Eades, Seok-Hee Hong
Copyright: © 2009 |Volume: 1 |Issue: 2 |Pages: 11
ISSN: 1941-6237|EISSN: 1941-6245|ISSN: 1941-6237|EISBN13: 9781615201587|EISSN: 1941-6245|DOI: 10.4018/jaci.2009040108
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Shen, Xiaobin, et al. "Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays." IJACI vol.1, no.2 2009: pp.59-69. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaci.2009040108

APA

Shen, X., Vande Moere, A., Eades, P., & Hong, S. (2009). Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays. International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), 1(2), 59-69. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaci.2009040108

Chicago

Shen, Xiaobin, et al. "Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays," International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI) 1, no.2: 59-69. http://doi.org/10.4018/jaci.2009040108

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This article is motivated by two evaluation case studies of ambient information displays. Firstly, an intrusive evaluation of a display called MoneyColor concentrates on the relationship between “distraction” and “comprehension”. This revealed that the comprehension is in direct proportion to display-distraction, but there is no clear relationship between comprehension and self-interruption. Secondly, a non-intrusive evaluation of a display called Fisherman described a quantitative measurement of user “interest” and applied this measurement to investigate “evaluation time” issue. These experiments give some insight into number of issues in evaluation of ambient displays.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.