E-Learning in India: Segmenting Students of a Business School based on their Perception

E-Learning in India: Segmenting Students of a Business School based on their Perception

Deepak Chawla, Himanshu Joshi
Copyright: © 2012 |Volume: 3 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 13
ISSN: 1947-8607|EISSN: 1947-878X|EISBN13: 9781466610569|DOI: 10.4018/javet.2012100101
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Chawla, Deepak, and Himanshu Joshi. "E-Learning in India: Segmenting Students of a Business School based on their Perception." IJAVET vol.3, no.4 2012: pp.1-13. http://doi.org/10.4018/javet.2012100101

APA

Chawla, D. & Joshi, H. (2012). E-Learning in India: Segmenting Students of a Business School based on their Perception. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET), 3(4), 1-13. http://doi.org/10.4018/javet.2012100101

Chicago

Chawla, Deepak, and Himanshu Joshi. "E-Learning in India: Segmenting Students of a Business School based on their Perception," International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET) 3, no.4: 1-13. http://doi.org/10.4018/javet.2012100101

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

E-learning has become an important tool to impart education. This study examines the awareness and perception of e-learning among Indian students enrolled for a business management course at a premier business school. It is generally perceived that since Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIM-A) is universally acknowledged for its quality of education, the awareness and perception about e-learning would be uniform. This could be attributed to factors like a sound educational background and the exposure to information technology. This study attempts to segment the sample based on the student perception towards e-learning. The results show that the level of awareness and the degree of familiarity with e-learning technologies are high. Three student clusters were found, which split the students into those with ‘high motivational & learning propensity’, ‘neutral motivational & learning propensity’ and ‘low motivational & learning propensity.’ These three clusters were labeled as ‘Enthusiastic,’ ‘Pragmatist,’ and ‘Unenthusiastic.’ Further, it was found that the age of students varied significantly within these three clusters.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.