Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub1
Songs to Syntax: Cognition, Combinatorial Computation, and the Origin of Language

Songs to Syntax: Cognition, Combinatorial Computation, and the Origin of Language

Robert C. Berwick
Copyright: © 2011 |Volume: 5 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 11
ISSN: 1557-3958|EISSN: 1557-3966|EISBN13: 9781613506028|DOI: 10.4018/jcini.2011100102
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Berwick, Robert C. "Songs to Syntax: Cognition, Combinatorial Computation, and the Origin of Language." IJCINI vol.5, no.4 2011: pp.22-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2011100102

APA

Berwick, R. C. (2011). Songs to Syntax: Cognition, Combinatorial Computation, and the Origin of Language. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI), 5(4), 22-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2011100102

Chicago

Berwick, Robert C. "Songs to Syntax: Cognition, Combinatorial Computation, and the Origin of Language," International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence (IJCINI) 5, no.4: 22-32. http://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2011100102

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Language comprises a central component of a complex that is sometimes called “the human capacity.” This complex seems to have crystallized fairly recently among a small group in East Africa of whom people are all descendants. Common descent has been important in the evolution of the brain, such that avian and mammalian brains may be largely homologous, particularly in the case of brain regions involved in auditory perception, vocalization and auditory memory. There has been convergent evolution of the capacity for auditory-vocal learning, and possibly for structuring of external vocalizations, such that apes lack the abilities that are shared between songbirds and humans. Language’s recent evolutionary origin suggests that the computational machinery underlying syntax arose via the introduction of a single, simple, combinatorial operation. Further, the relation of a simple combinatorial syntax to the sensory-motor and thought systems reveals language to be asymmetric in design: while it precisely matches the representations required for inner mental thought, acting as the “glue” that binds together other internal cognitive and sensory modalities, at the same time it poses computational difficulties for externalization, that is, parsing and speech or signed production. Despite this mismatch, language syntax leads directly to the rich cognitive array that marks us as a symbolic species.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.