Reference Hub22
Digital Governance Worldwide: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites

Digital Governance Worldwide: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites

Tony Carrizales, Marc Holzer, Seang-Tae Kim, Chan-Gon Kim
Copyright: © 2006 |Volume: 2 |Issue: 4 |Pages: 23
ISSN: 1548-3886|EISSN: 1548-3894|ISSN: 1548-3886|EISBN13: 9781615202614|EISSN: 1548-3894|DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2006100101
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Carrizales, Tony, et al. "Digital Governance Worldwide: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites." IJEGR vol.2, no.4 2006: pp.1-23. http://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006100101

APA

Carrizales, T., Holzer, M., Kim, S., & Kim, C. (2006). Digital Governance Worldwide: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 2(4), 1-23. http://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006100101

Chicago

Carrizales, Tony, et al. "Digital Governance Worldwide: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites," International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR) 2, no.4: 1-23. http://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006100101

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

This article highlights the research findings of a digital governance survey conducted in the fall of 2005. The study replicates a 2003 survey of large municipalities worldwide. This longitudinal assessment, based on the Rutgers-SKKU E-Governance Performance Index, focused on the evaluation of current practices in government, with emphasis on the evaluation of each Web site in terms of digital governance. Specifically, we analyzed security, usability, content of Web sites, the type of online services currently being offered, and citizen response and participation through Web sites established by city governments. Based on the 2005 evaluation of 81 cities, Seoul, New York, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Sydney represent the highest performing cities in digital governance. There were only slight changes in the top five cities when compared to the 2003 study. Moreover, there continues to be a divide in terms of digital governance throughout the world among the 30 developed nations belonging to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and non-OECD member nations.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.