Economic Growth, Technical Progress and Labor Productivity: Knowledge Economics and New Forms of Technical Progress

Economic Growth, Technical Progress and Labor Productivity: Knowledge Economics and New Forms of Technical Progress

Alain Herscovici
Copyright: © 2011 |Volume: 2 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 13
ISSN: 1947-8305|EISSN: 1947-8313|EISBN13: 9781613507896|DOI: 10.4018/jide.2011010103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Herscovici, Alain. "Economic Growth, Technical Progress and Labor Productivity: Knowledge Economics and New Forms of Technical Progress." IJIDE vol.2, no.1 2011: pp.35-47. http://doi.org/10.4018/jide.2011010103

APA

Herscovici, A. (2011). Economic Growth, Technical Progress and Labor Productivity: Knowledge Economics and New Forms of Technical Progress. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), 2(1), 35-47. http://doi.org/10.4018/jide.2011010103

Chicago

Herscovici, Alain. "Economic Growth, Technical Progress and Labor Productivity: Knowledge Economics and New Forms of Technical Progress," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE) 2, no.1: 35-47. http://doi.org/10.4018/jide.2011010103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

The debate on deindustrialization assumes that domestic industry is a leading sector and produces positive externalities for the whole economy. This paper will partially refute this. Since the early 1990’s, most developed and emerging economies have been subjected to two paradoxes: the paradox of Solow, which calls into question the relationship between ICT investment and productivity gains, and the paradox of Gordon, showing that productivity gains in the ICT sector do not propagate to all other sectors. These paradoxes lead one to question the linear nature of the kaldorian cumulative mechanisms. Following both a theoretical and an empirical approach, such relationships are analyzed from the viewpoint of the various models of unbalanced growth built by Baumol. The author will highlight the limits of such models and provide elements for an alternative explanation. Ultimately, the real problem is to investigate the economic nature and the role that services and forms of intangible capital play in the new dynamic of growth.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.