Reference Hub6
User-Developed Applications: Can End Users Assess Quality?

User-Developed Applications: Can End Users Assess Quality?

Copyright: © 2002 |Volume: 14 |Issue: 3 |Pages: 15
ISSN: 1546-2234|EISSN: 1546-5012|ISSN: 1546-2234|EISBN13: 9781615201037|EISSN: 1546-5012|DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.2002070101
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

McGill, Tanya J. "User-Developed Applications: Can End Users Assess Quality?." JOEUC vol.14, no.3 2002: pp.1-15. http://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2002070101

APA

McGill, T. J. (2002). User-Developed Applications: Can End Users Assess Quality?. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 14(3), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2002070101

Chicago

McGill, Tanya J. "User-Developed Applications: Can End Users Assess Quality?," Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 14, no.3: 1-15. http://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2002070101

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Organizations rely heavily on applications developed by end users, yet lack of experience and training may compromise the ability of end users to make objective judgments about the quality of their applications. This study investigated the ability of end users to assess the quality of applications they develop. The results confirm that there are differences between the system quality assessments of end user developers and independent expert assessors. In particular, the results of this study suggest that end users with little experience may erroneously consider the applications they develop to be of high quality. Some implications of these results are discussed.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.