Welcome to the InfoSci Platform
Reference Hub14
In Defense of Dominance: PAD Usage in Computational Representations of Affect

In Defense of Dominance: PAD Usage in Computational Representations of Affect

Joost Broekens
Copyright: © 2012 |Volume: 3 |Issue: 1 |Pages: 10
ISSN: 1947-9093|EISSN: 1947-9107|EISBN13: 9781466614376|DOI: 10.4018/jse.2012010103
Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Broekens, Joost. "In Defense of Dominance: PAD Usage in Computational Representations of Affect." IJSE vol.3, no.1 2012: pp.33-42. http://doi.org/10.4018/jse.2012010103

APA

Broekens, J. (2012). In Defense of Dominance: PAD Usage in Computational Representations of Affect. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions (IJSE), 3(1), 33-42. http://doi.org/10.4018/jse.2012010103

Chicago

Broekens, Joost. "In Defense of Dominance: PAD Usage in Computational Representations of Affect," International Journal of Synthetic Emotions (IJSE) 3, no.1: 33-42. http://doi.org/10.4018/jse.2012010103

Export Reference

Mendeley
Favorite Full-Issue Download

Abstract

Factor-based models of emotion (affect) are often used in the field of emotion modeling and emotion measurement, in particular the three factor model commonly known as Pleasure, Arousal, and Dominance (PAD). This article addresses computational use and usefulness of the third factor, i.e., Dominance. The claim made in this article is that Dominance should be seriously considered when modeling or measuring affect. More concretely, it presents an easy to understand conceptual description of Dominance, followed by cases in which Dominance was instrumental in modeling synthetic affect, as well as cases in which Dominance was instrumental in measuring user affect. Finally, it relates the PAD factor model to appraisal dimensions.

Request Access

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.