In Defense of Ambiguity

doi:10.4018/jswis.2008040101

Reference Hub

This research has been cited in:

Chapter
Theories of Semantics on the WebSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_4
Conference
Does the web extend the mind?Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference10.1145/2464464.2479972
Chapter
The Semantic WebSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_3
Chapter
On the Likelihood of an EquivalenceOn the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_2
Chapter
Semantic Annotation and Retrieval: Web of DataHandbook of Semantic Web Technologies10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_6
Chapter
The Semantics of TaggingSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_5
Article
Social Meaning on the Web: From Wittgenstein to Search EnginesIEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2009.122
Article
Relevance Feedback between Hypertext and Semantic Web Search: Frameworks and EvaluationSSRN Electronic Journal 10.2139/ssrn.3199537
Chapter
Forschungsdaten in der MedienwissenschaftHandbuch Digitale Medien und Methoden10.1007/978-3-658-36629-2_6-1
Chapter
An Ontology of Resources: Solving the Identity CrisisThe Semantic Web: Research and Applications10.1007/978-3-642-02121-3_39
Chapter
Architecture of the World Wide WebSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_2
Chapter
ReferencesIdentification and Management of Distributed Data10.1201/b14966-29
Chapter
A Role for Semantic Web Technologies in Patient Record Data CollectionLinking Enterprise Data10.1007/978-1-4419-7665-9_12
Article
Relevance feedback between hypertext and Semantic Web search: Frameworks and evaluationJournal of Web Semantics10.1016/j.websem.2011.10.001
Chapter
The Semantics of SearchSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_6
Chapter
An Identification Ontology for Entity MatchingOn the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2014 Workshops10.1007/978-3-662-45550-0_60
Chapter
Social SemanticsSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_7
Chapter
Interview with Tim Berners‐LeePhilosophical Engineering10.1002/9781118700143.ch12
Article
Sense and Reference on the WebMinds and Machines10.1007/s11023-011-9230-6
Article
The History and Future of Data Citation in PracticeData Science Journal10.5334/dsj-2019-052
Conference
From linked data to linked entitiesProceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2187980.2187994
Conference
Speech acts meet taggingProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems10.1145/1839707.1839746
Chapter
IntroductionSocial Semantics10.1007/978-1-4614-1885-6_1

In Defense of Ambiguity

Patrick J. Hayes, Harry Halpin

Source Title: International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS)4(2)

Cite Article Cite Article

MLA

Hayes, Patrick J., and Harry Halpin. "In Defense of Ambiguity." IJSWIS vol.4, no.2 2008: pp.1-18. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2008040101

APA

Hayes, P. J. & Halpin, H. (2008). In Defense of Ambiguity. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 4(2), 1-18. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2008040101

Chicago

Hayes, Patrick J., and Harry Halpin. "In Defense of Ambiguity," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 4, no.2: 1-18. http://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2008040101

Export Reference

Favorite Full-Issue Download

View Full Text PDF

Abstract

URIs, a universal identification scheme, are different from human names insofar as they can provide the ability to reliably access the thing identified. URIs also can function to reference a non-accessible thing in a similar manner to how names function in natural language. There are two distinctly different relationships between names and things: access and reference. To confuse the two relations leads to underlying problems with Web architecture. Reference is by nature ambiguous in any language. So any attempts by Web architecture to make reference completely unambiguous will fail on the Web. Despite popular belief otherwise, making further ontological distinctions often leads to more ambiguity, not less. Contrary to appeals to Kripke for some sort of eternal and unique identification, reference on the Web uses descriptions and therefore there is no unambiguous resolution of reference. On the Web, what is needed is not just a simple redirection, but a uniform and logically consistent manner of associating descriptions with URIs that can be done in a number of practical ways that should be made consistent.

You do not own this content. Please login to recommend this title to your institution's librarian or purchase it from the IGI Global bookstore.

Username or email: *

Password: *

Forgot individual login password?

Create individual account

In Defense of Ambiguity

MLA

APA

Chicago

Export Reference

Abstract

Request Access