loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Author: Ibrahim A. Hameed

Affiliation: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway

Keyword(s): Automatic Assessment, Academic Assessment, Students’ Achievement, Efficient and Effective Assessment, Question Importance, Question Complexity, Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support Systems ; Computer-Supported Education ; Domain Applications and Case Studies ; e-Learning ; Enterprise Information Systems ; Information Technologies Supporting Learning ; Intelligent Learning and Teaching Systems ; Intelligent Tutoring Systems ; Learning/Teaching Methodologies and Assessment ; Smart Devices as Collaborative Learning Tools ; Ubiquitous Learning

Abstract: Examination is one of the common assessment methods to assess the level of knowledge of students. Assessment methods probably have a greater influence on how and what students learn than any other factor. Assessment is used to discriminate not only between different students but also between different levels of thinking. Due to the increasing trends in class sizes and limited resources for teaching, the need arises for exploring other assessment methods. Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) have been highlighted as the main way of coping with the large group teaching, ease of use, testing large number of students on a wide range of course material, in a short time and with low grading costs. MCQs have been criticised for encouraging surface learning and its unfairness. MCQs have a variety of scoring options; the most widely used method is to compute the score by only focusing on the responses that the student made. In this case, the number of correct responses is counted, the number of i ncorrect answers is counted and a final score is reported as either the number of the correct answers or the number of correct answers minus the number of incorrect answers. The disadvantages of this approach are that other dimensions such as importance and complexity of questions are not considered, and in addition, it cannot discriminate between students with equal total score. In this paper, a method to automatically evaluate MCQs considering importance and complexity of each question and providing a fairer way to discriminating between students with equal total scores is presented. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.144.84.155

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Hameed, I. (2016). A Fuzzy System to Automatically Evaluate and Improve Fairness of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) based Exams. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU; ISBN 978-989-758-179-3; ISSN 2184-5026, SciTePress, pages 476-481. DOI: 10.5220/0005897204760481

@conference{csedu16,
author={Ibrahim A. Hameed.},
title={A Fuzzy System to Automatically Evaluate and Improve Fairness of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) based Exams},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU},
year={2016},
pages={476-481},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005897204760481},
isbn={978-989-758-179-3},
issn={2184-5026},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU
TI - A Fuzzy System to Automatically Evaluate and Improve Fairness of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) based Exams
SN - 978-989-758-179-3
IS - 2184-5026
AU - Hameed, I.
PY - 2016
SP - 476
EP - 481
DO - 10.5220/0005897204760481
PB - SciTePress