loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Prevlan Chetty and Solomon Tesfamichael

Affiliation: Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Keyword(s): GIS, Remote Sensing, Interpolation, LiDAR, Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighting, Spline, Nearest Neighbour, Topo to Raster, ANUDEM, Chief Directorate National Geospatial Information, NGI.

Abstract: Continuous elevation surfaces, which are commonly referred to as Digital Elevation Models (DEM), are vital sources of information in flood modelling. Due to the multitude of interpolation techniques available to create DEMs, there is a need to identify the best suited interpolation techniques to represent a localised hydrological environment. This study investigated the accuracies of commonly applied interpolation techniques including Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Nearest Neighbour (NN), Kriging, Spline and Topo to Raster interpolation techniques as applied to a 5-m interval elevation contours as a precursor to simulate a flood zone in the Roodepoort region in Johannesburg, South Africa. A 50 cm resolution DEM derived from aerial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) point cloud was used as a reference to compare the five interpolations techniques. The Topo to Raster results were not significantly different from the reference data (P = 0.79 at 95% confidence level), where elevation values were on average underestimated by 0.93 m. In contrast, the spline interpolation showed the highest significant difference from the reference data (P = 0.00 at 95% confidence level), with an average underestimation of the elevation by 69.84 m. Outlier identification using standardized residual analysis flagged significant elevation outliers that were produced in the interpolation process, and it was noted that most of the outliers across all techniques coincide with areas that showed frequent topographical changes. Specifically, the largest significant differences using the Topo to Raster technique were overestimations of the elevation that occur in the upstream section of the tributary. The Spline technique in contrast showed significant underestimations of the elevation throughout the river system. Overall, the results indicate that the Topo to Raster technique is preferred to accurately represent the topography around a river system of the study area. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 13.59.100.42

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Chetty, P. and Tesfamichael, S. (2021). A Comparison of Interpolation Techniques in Producing a DEM from the 5 m National Geospatial Institute (NGI) Contours. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management - GISTAM; ISBN 978-989-758-503-6; ISSN 2184-500X, SciTePress, pages 37-47. DOI: 10.5220/0010525100370047

@conference{gistam21,
author={Prevlan Chetty. and Solomon Tesfamichael.},
title={A Comparison of Interpolation Techniques in Producing a DEM from the 5 m National Geospatial Institute (NGI) Contours},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management - GISTAM},
year={2021},
pages={37-47},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0010525100370047},
isbn={978-989-758-503-6},
issn={2184-500X},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management - GISTAM
TI - A Comparison of Interpolation Techniques in Producing a DEM from the 5 m National Geospatial Institute (NGI) Contours
SN - 978-989-758-503-6
IS - 2184-500X
AU - Chetty, P.
AU - Tesfamichael, S.
PY - 2021
SP - 37
EP - 47
DO - 10.5220/0010525100370047
PB - SciTePress