Skip to main content

Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems

Systemic constraints and effective practices

  • Chapter
Advances in Digital Government

Part of the book series: Advances in Database Systems ((ADBS,volume 26))

Abstract

Successful digital government policies and applications often depend on the ability of multiple organizations to collaborate toward shared objectives. Despite compelling benefits, these efforts are fraught with problems, and often fail. The developmental experiences of 18 collaborative digital government initiatives in New York State reveal five systemic constraints that account for the common difficulties: divergent roles, multiple missions, operational diversity, changing technology, and limited ability to adapt to change. The project experiences also offered ten guiding principles that can help make collaborative systems more successful. These focus on purpose, stakeholders, partnership, leadership, managing complexity, skills, resources, communication, work processes, and explicit design methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigler, B.A. (1994). “The County-State Connection: A National Study of Associations of Counties.” Public Administration Review 54(1): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Technology in Government. (2000). The Insider’s Guide to Using Information in Government at http://www.ctg.albany.edu/guides/usinginfo. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S. (1995). Interagency Information Sharing: Expected Benefits, Manageable Risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3): 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S., et al. (1997.) Tying a Sensible Knot: A Practical Guide to State-Local Information Systems. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S., Pardo T., Connelly, D., Green, D., & Mclnerney, C. (1997). Partners in State-Local Information Systems: Lessons from the Field, Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government University at Albany/SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S., Bloniarz, P., Kelly, K., & Fletcher, P. (1999). Some Assembly Required: Building a Digital Government for the 21 st Century, Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, W. H. (1999). Society on the Line: Information Politics in the Digital Age. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (1999). Reinventing Government in the Information Age in Heeks, R., ed. Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. et al. (1995.) Sharing the Costs, Sharing the Benefits: The NYS GIS Cooperative Project. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany/SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. & van Dissel, H.G. (1996 September). “Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems.” MIS Quarterly: 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsbergen, David and George Wolken. (2001). “Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology.” Public Administration Review 61:2:206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. (1992). Network Dyads on Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Relationships, Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 76–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey, D.P., Faerman, S.R., & Hart, D.W. (1995). The Appeal and Difficulties of Participative Systems, Organization Science 6(6): 603–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Performance Review (1993). Report on the National Performance Review. Washington D.C: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, T. A. (1998.) Reducing the risks in innovative uses of information technology in the public sector: A multidisciplinary model. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J.A. (1987). Pathways to Cooperation among Public Agencies, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7(Fall): 94–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dawes, S.S., Pardo, T.A. (2002). Building Collaborative Digital Government Systems. In: McIver, W.J., Elmagarmid, A.K. (eds) Advances in Digital Government. Advances in Database Systems, vol 26. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47374-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47374-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7067-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47374-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics