Abstract
This chapter will provide an overview of the structuring concepts that are proposed for the coming UML 2.0. This will be done through an example. We will illustrate that these concepts are designed such that structuring applied to classes may be reflected in the corresponding structuring of the interactions between the parts of a class.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jacobson, “Language Support for Changeable Large Real Time Systems”, OOPSLA’86, ACM Special Issue of Sigplan Notices, Vol. 21, No. 11, 1986. pp. 377–384.
Rockstrom, and R. Saracco, “SDL-CCITT specification and description language”, IEEE Trans. Communications, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1982. pp. 1310–1318.
Møller-Pedersen, D. Belsnes, and H.P. Dahle, “Rationale and Tutorial on OSDL: An Object-Oriented Extension of SDL”, Computer Networks, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1987.
J. Grabowski and E. Rudolph, “Putting Extended Sequence Charts to Practice”, in Proc. 4th SDL Forum. North-Holland, Lisbon, 1989.
International Telecommunications Union, Message Sequence Charts (MSC), Recommendation Z.120, ITU-T, Geneva, 1999.
Harel. “Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems”, Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1987.
Garlan and M. Shaw, “An Introduction to Software Architecture”, 1–39. Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 2., World Scientific Press, New York, 1993.
Garlan, R. Monroe, and D. Wile: “ACME: An Architecture Description Interchange Language”, Proc. of CASCON, 1997. pp. 169–183.
D. Luckham, et al., “Specification and Analysis of System Architecture Using Rapide”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1995.
B. Selic, G. Gullekson, and P.T. Ward, Real-Time Object-Oriented Modeling, 1994.
C. Bock and J. Odell, “A Foundation for Composition”, Journal Of Object-Oriented Programming, Vol. 7, No 6, 1994.
D. Harel and E. Gery, “Executable Object Modeling with Statecharts”, IEEE Computer, July 1997.
International Telecommunications Union, Specification and Description Language (SDL), Recommendation Z.100, ITU-T, Geneva, 1999.
B. Møller-Pedersen and T. Weigert, “Towards a Convergence of SDL and UML”, Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language, Ft. Collins, 1999.
D. Garlan, J. Knapman, B. Møller-Pedersen, B. Selic, and T. Weigert, “Modeling of Architectures with UML”, Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language, York, 2000.
R. Bræk, J. Gorman, Ø. Haugen, G. Melby, B. Møller-Pedersen, and R. Sanders, “Quality by construction exemplified by TIMe-The Integrated Methodology,” Telektronikk, Vol. 95, No. 1, 1999. pp. 73–82. See also http://www.sintef.no/time, Sintef, Trondheim, 1997.
International Telecommunications Union, SDL Combined with UML, Recommendation Z.109, ITU-T, Geneva. 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haugen, Ø., Møller-Pedersen, B., Weigert, T. (2003). Structural Modeling with UML 2.0. In: Lavagno, L., Martin, G., Selic, B. (eds) UML for Real. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48738-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48738-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-7501-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48738-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive