Skip to main content
  • 80 Accesses

A noninteractive proof may be viewed as a variation of an interactive proof [3], with two differences. Firstly, the interaction between the prover and the verifier is limited to the exchange of a single message, which is sent by the prover to the verifier. Secondly, both the prover and verifier are given access to a uniformly random bit string, referred to as the common reference string. Intuitively, the common reference string provides a way to challenge the prover (even though the verifier is not allowed to send any message to the prover).

A noninteractive zero-knowledge proof, as introduced in [1, 2], is a noninteractive proof satisfying the zero-knowledge property. In this case, the zeroknowledge property holds if it is possible to efficiently generate both the common reference string and a (valid) noninteractive zero-knowledge proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blum, M., A. De Santis, S. Micali, and G. Persiano (1991). “Non-interactive zero-knowledge proof systems.” SIAM Journal on Computing, 20 (6), 1084–1118.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, M., P. Feldman, and S. Micali (1988). “Non-interactive zero-knowledge and its applications.” Proceedings of the 20th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldreich, O. (2001). Foundations of Cryptography—Basic Tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 International Federation for Information Processing

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schoenmakers, B. (2005). Noninteractive Proof. In: van Tilborg, H.C.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23483-7_273

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics