Skip to main content

Federated Mediators for Query Composite Answers

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Information Systems VI
  • 632 Accesses

Abstract

The capture, the structuring and the exploitation of the expertise or the capabilities of an “object” (like a business partner, an employee, a software component, a Web site, etc.) are crucial problems in various applications, like cooperative and distributed applications or e-business and e-commerce applications. The work we describe in this paper concerns the advertising of the capabilities or the know-how of an object. The capabilities are structured and organized in order to be used when searching for objects that satisfy a given objective or that meet a given need. One of the originality of our proposal is in the nature of the answers the intended system can return. Indeed, the answers are not Yes/No answers but they may be cooperative answers in that sense that when no single object meets the search criteria, the system attempts to find out what a set of “complementary” objects do satisfy the whole search criteria, every object in the resulting set satisfying part of the criteria. In this approach, Description Logics (DL) is used as a knowledge representation formalism and classification techniques are used as search mechanisms. The determination of the “complementary objects” is founded on the DL complement concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beeri, C., Levy, A., and Rousset, M.-C. (1997). Rewriting Queries Using Views in Description Logics. In ACM Symposium on Principles Of Database Systems, pages 99–108, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgida, A. (1995). Description Logics in Data Management. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7(5):671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgida, A. and Devanhu, P. (1999). Adding more “DL” to IDL: Towards more Knowledgeable Component Interoperability. In 21rst International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE’99, pages 378–387, Los Angeles, CA. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchikhi, M. and Boudjlida, N. (1998). Using Larch to Specify the Behavior of Objects in Open Distributed Environments. In Proceedings of the 1998 Maghrebian Conference on Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, pages 275–287, Tunis, Tunisia. 98-R-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudjlida, N. (1995). Knowledge in Interoperable and Evolutionary Systems. In Dreschler-Fischer, L. and Pribbenow, S., editors, KRDB’95, Workshop on “Reasoning about Structured Objets: Knowledge Representation Meets Databases”, pages 25–26, Bielefeld, Germany. (Position Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudjlida, N. (2002). A Mediator-Based Architecture for Capability Management. In Hamza, M., editor, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, SEA 2002, pages 45–50, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvanese, D., de Giacomo, D., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., and Rosati, R. (1998). Information Integration: Coceptual Modeling and Reasoning Support. In 6th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, CoopIS’98, pages 280–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • DL-org (2003). Description logics. http//dl.kr.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, T. (2002). Uddi 2.0 provides ties that bind. (http://www.eweek.com/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaslev, V. and Moller, R. (2003). Racer: Renamed abox and concept expression reasoner. http://www.fhwedel.de/mo/racer/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, T.-D., Purao, S., and Storey, V. (1999). A Methodology for Building a Repository of Object-Oriented Design Fragments. In 18th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling, ER’99, pages 203–217, Paris. Spriger Verlag. LNCS 1728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks, I. (2002a). DAML+OIL: a description logic for the semantic web. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 25(1):4–9.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks, I. (2002b). Description Logic: Axioms and Rules. Talk given at Dagstuhl “Rule Markup Technique” Workshop. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/horrocks/Slides/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, A. (1997). Une introduction aux logiques de description. Technical Report RR No 3314, INRIALORIA, Nancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company; How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMG (1992). The Object Model Architecture Guide. Technical Report 91.11.1, Revision 2.0, Object Management Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Schauss, M. and Smolka, G. (1991). Attribute Concepts Description with Complements. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 48(1):1–26.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • uddi.org (2000). UDDI: Universal Description, Discovery and Integration. Technical White Paper. (http://uddi.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • W3C (2003a). Semantic Web. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw.

    Google Scholar 

  • W3C (2003b). Web Ontology. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt.

    Google Scholar 

  • W3C (2003c). Web Services. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheng, D., Boudjlida, N. (2006). Federated Mediators for Query Composite Answers. In: Seruca, I., Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Filipe, J. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems VI. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3675-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3675-2_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3674-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3675-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics