Skip to main content

Expertise Sharing in a Heterogeneous Organizational Environment

  • Conference paper
Book cover ECSCW 2005

Abstract

The term knowledge management (KM) has lost most of its magic during the past few years: While knowledge has been identified as an important resource and key factor for productivity gains and innovation in organizations, there seems to be no generally applicable (and easy) way to utilize this resource. In this paper we present results of a field study that was conducted within a major European industrial association. The study focused on knowledge intense processes among the association and its member companies which were supposed to be improved by KM strategies and systems. The organizational setting appears to be unique in different ways: A grown and highly decentralized organizational structure, goods that exclusively consist of human and social capital and a distinct mutual unawareness of competencies and responsibilities within the organization define our field of application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. W. (1996): ‘Answer Garden 2: Merging Orgaizational Memory with Collaborative Help’, in International Conference on CSCW’96, ACM Press, New York, pp. 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M.S. (1998): ‘Augmenting Organizational Memory: A Field Study of Answer Garden’, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), vol. 16, no. 3, 1998, pp. 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becks, A., Reichling, T., Wulf, V. (2004): ‘Expertise Finding: Approaches to Foster Social Capital’, in M. Huysman and V. Wulf (eds.): Social Capital and Information Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2004, pp. 333–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J. R. (2003): ‘Ethnomethodologie’, in U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke (eds.): Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Hamburg, pp. 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. and Prusak, L. (2001): In Good Company: How Social Capital makes Organizations Work, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, K. (2003): ‘Locating Expertise: Design Issues for an Expertise Locator System’, in M. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf (eds.): Sharing Expertise-Beyond Knowledge Management, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2002): Qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Einführung, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, L. N. (1997): ‘Yenta: a multi-agent, referral-based matchmaking system’, in Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents. USA, ACM Press, New York, pp. 301–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1988): ‘Why CSCW Applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces’, in Proceedings CSCW’ 88, Portland 26.–29. September 1988, pp.85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. and Palen, L. (1995): ‘Why groupware succeeds: Discretion or mandate?’, in Proceedings of the European Conference in Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, pp. 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R., Randall, D., Rouncefield, M.: (2000): Organizational change and Retail Finance: An Ethnographic Approach, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. J. and Pfeffer, J. (2003): ‘Why Organizations Don’t “Know What They Know”’, in M. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf (eds.): Sharing Expertise-Beyond Knowledge Management, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. W. (2000): Supporting Nuance in Groupware Design: Moving from Naturalistic Expertise Location to Expertise Recommendation, PhD-thesis, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. W. (2001): ‘Evaluating Expertise Recommendation’, in Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, 2001, ACM Press, New York, pp. 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. E. (2003): Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher, Upper SaddleRiver, Pearson Education, Inc, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1996): ‘Evolving with Notes: Organizational change around groupware technology’, in C. Ciborra (ed.): Groupware & Teamwork, J. Wiley, Chichester et al., pp. 23–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (1999): ‘A Groupware’s Life’, in Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW’99. Netherlands, 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. (2003): ‘Pruning the Answer Garden: Knowledge Sharing in Maintenance Engineering’, in Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2003), Helsinki, Finland, 14–18 September, Kluwer Academic) Publishers, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipek, V., Hinrichs, J., Wulf, V. (2003): ‘Sharing Expertise: Challenges for Technical Support’, in M. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf (eds.): Sharing Expertise-Beyond Knowledge Management, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. and Bentley, R. (1994): Tutorial on ‘Ethnography and collaborative systems development II: practical application in a commercial context’, CSCW’ 94, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Sept, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C. (2003): ‘Analyse von Leitfadeninterviews’, in U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke (eds.): Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch, 2003, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Hamburg, pp. 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, L. A. and Lochbaum, K. E. (1988): ‘Who Knows: A System Based on Automatic Representation of Semantic Structure’, in RIAO’ 88, Cambridge, MA, pp. 380–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivacque, A. and Lieberman, H. (2000): ‘Agents to assist in finding help’, in Proceedings in the Conference on Human Computer Interaction (CHI 2000), ACM Press, New York, pp. 65–72.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, V. and Rohde, M. (1995): ‘Towards an integrated organization and technology development’, in Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques, 1995, ACM Press, New York, pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reichling, T., Veith, M. (2005). Expertise Sharing in a Heterogeneous Organizational Environment. In: Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. (eds) ECSCW 2005. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4022-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4023-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics