Abstract
In addition to describing facts and events, texts often communicate information about the attitude of the writer or various participants towards material being described. The most salient clues about attitude are provided by the lexical choice of the writer but, as discussed below, the organization of the text also contributes information relevant to assessing attitude. We argue that the current work in this area that concentrates mainly on the negative or positive attitude communicated by individual terms (Edmonds and Hirst, 2002; Hatzivassiloglou and McKeown, 1997; Turney and Littman, 2002; Wiebe et al., 2001) is incomplete and often gives the wrong results when implemented directly. We then describe how the base attitudinal valence of a lexical item is modified by lexical and discourse context and propose a simple, “proof of concept” implementation for some contextual shifters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
5. Bibliography
Das, S. and Chen, M. (2001) Yahoo! For Amazon: extracting market sentiment from stock message boards. Paper presented in the 8th Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference, Bankok, Thailand.
Edmonds, P. and Hirst, G. (2002) Near-synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 28(2), 105–144.
Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. (1986) Attention, Intention, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175–204.
Hatzivassiloglou, V. and McKeown K. (1997) Predicting the Semantic Orientation of Adjectives. Computational Linguistics, 174–181.
Hatzivassiloglou, V. and Wiebe, J. (2000) Effects of Adjective Orientation and Gradability on Sentence Subjectivity. Paper presented at Coling 2000. Saarbrucken.
Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3), 243–281.
Pang, B. Lee, L. and Vaithyanathan, V. (2002) Thumbs up? Sentiment Classification using Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing. 79–86.
Polanyi, L. and Scha, R. (1984) A Syntactic Approach to Discourse Semantics. Paper presented at 6th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Stanford, CA.
Riloff, E. and Wiebe, J. (2003) Learning Extraction Patterns for Subjective Expressions. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 105–112.
Tong, R. (2001) An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussion. Paper presented at the SIGIR Workshop on Operational Text Classification.
Turney, P. and Littman, M. (2002) Unsupervised Learning of Semantic Orientation from a Hundred-Billion-Word Corpus. Technical Report, National Research Council Canada, Institute for Information Technology, ERB-1094, NRC-44929.
Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., and Bell, M. (2001) Identifying Collocations for Recognizing Opinions. Paper presented at the ACL/EACL’ 01 Workshop on Collocation, Toulouse, France, July 2001.
Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Bruce, R., Bell, M., and Martin, M. (2004) Learning subjective language. Computational Linguistics 30(3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A. (2006). Contextual Valence Shifters. In: Shanahan, J.G., Qu, Y., Wiebe, J. (eds) Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. The Information Retrieval Series, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4102-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4026-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4102-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)