Abstract
We argue that the currently dominant methods in Information Systems are not satisfactory for emancipatory research and development whose starting point is work. Activity theory was proposed as such an emancipatory research-cumdevelopment approach in IS a decade ago. However, the potential identified in the theory has not fully materialized. As our own contribution toward making activity theory more operational in IS, we present an elaborated framework, ActAD, and review our experience in applying it to descriptive research, practical analysis, and constructive research. We claim that in order to fully unleash the potential of activity theory, activity-based methods should be developed further for IS requirements analysis projects and IS implementation projects, as well as for facilitating software development. The most appropriate way of developing such applied methods is through collaborative action research in real-life information systems work—the information systems practitioners developing their own work through activity analysis and development, with researcher participation.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Alter, S. “A General, Yet Useful Theory of Information Systems,” Communications of the AIS (1:13), 1999, pp. 1–69.
Alter, S. “Which Life Cycle: Work System, Information System, or Software?,” Communications of the AIS (7:17), 2001, pp. 1–53.
Alter, S. “The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information System Research,” Communications of the AIS (9), 2002, pp. 90–104.
Bardram, J. “Temporal Coordination: Of Time and Collaborative Activities at a Surgical Department,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (9:2), 2000, pp. 157–187.
Bertelsen, O. W., and Bødker, S. “Introduction: Information Technology in Human Activity,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (12:1), 2000, pp. 3–14.
Bødker, S. “Activity Theory as a Challenge to Systems Design,” in H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirscheim (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 551–564.
Bødker, S. “Computers in Mediated Human Activity,” Mind, Culture, and Activity (4:3), 1997, pp. 149–158.
Engeström, Y. “Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation,” in Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, UK, 1999, pp. 19–38.
Engeström, Y. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
Fowler, M. UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
Grudin, J. “Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers,” Communications of the ACM(37:1), 1994, pp. 92–105.
Hedegaard, M.; Chaiklin, S.; and Jensen, U. J. “Activity Theory and Social Practice: An Introduction,” in S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard and U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches, Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 1999, pp. 12–30.
Häkkinen, H. “Rapid Method for Integration Requirements Assessment: Case Maternity Care,” in S. Laukkanen and S. Sarpola (Eds.), Electronic Proceedings of the 26th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 2003.
Iivari, J., and Lyytinen, K. “Research on Information Systems Development in Scandinavia: Unity in Plurality,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (10:1/2), 1998, pp. 135–185.
Kensing, F., and Blomberg, J. “Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (7:3/4), 1998, pp. 167–185.
Korpela, M.; Eerola, A.; Mursu, A.; and Soriyan, H. A. “Use Cases as Actions Within Activities: Bridging the Gap Between Information Systems Development and Software Engineering,” abstract, in Proceedings of the Second Nordic-Baltic Conference on Activity Theory and Sociocultural Research, Ronneby, Sweden, 2001a, p. 51.
Korpela, M.; Mursu, A.; and Soriyan, H. A. “Two Times Four Integrative Levels of Analysis: A Framework,” in N. L. Russo, B. Fitzgerald and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective, Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2001b, pp. 367–377.
Korpela, M.; Mursu, A.; Soriyan, H. A.; and Eerola, A. “Information Systems Research and Information Systems Practice in a Network of Activities,” in Y. Dittrich, C. Floyd, and R. Klischewski (Eds.), Social Thinking-Software Practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002a, pp. 287–308.
Korpela, M.; Mursu, A.; Soriyan, H. A.; and Olufokunbi, K. C. “Information Systems Development as an Activity,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (11:1/2), 2002b, pp. 111–128.
Korpela, M.; Soriyan, H. A.; and Olufokunbi, K. C. “Activity Analysis as a Method for Information Systems Development: General Introduction and Experiments from Nigeria and Finland,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (12:1), 2000, pp. 191–210.
Kuutti, K. “Activity Theory and its Applications to Information Systems Research and Development,” in H-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1991, pp. 529–549.
Leontiev, A. N. Activity, Consciousness and Personality, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
Mursu, A.; Soriyan, A.; and Korpela, M. “ICT for Development: Sustainable Systems for Local Needs,” in-progress research paper presented at the IFIP TC8 & TC9/WG8.2 & WG9.4 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, 2003.
Mursu, A.; Soriyan, H. A.; and Korpela, M. “Risky Business: A Case Study on Information Systems Development in Nigeria,” in S. Krishna and S. Madon (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies and Development: New Opportunities, Perspectives and Challenges, Bangalore: Indian Institute of Management, 2002, pp. 385–401.
Mwanza, D. Towards an Activity-Oriented Design Method for HCI Research and Practice, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, 2002 available online at http://iet.open.ac.uk/pp/d.mwanza/Phd.htm.
Myers, M. D. “Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research,” Communication of the AIS (2:23), 1999, pp. 1–20.
Orlikowski, W. J., and Baroudi, J. J. “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research (2), 1991, pp. 1–28.
Redmiles, D. “Introduction,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Special Issue on Activity Theory (11:1/2), 2002, pp. 1–11.
Robertson, S., and Robertson, R. Mastering the Requirements Process, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1999.
Soriyan, H. A. A Conceptual Framework for Improved Information Systems Development Methodology, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, 2004.
Toivanen, M.; Eerola, A.; and Korpela, M. “From Information Systems Requirements to Software Components: Home Care Case,” in S. Laukkanen and S. Sarpola (Eds.), Electronic Proceedings of the 26th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, 2003.
Vrazalic, L., and Gould, E. “Towards an Activity-Based Usability Evaluation Methodology,” in M. Anders, A. Opdahl, and S. Bjørnstad (Eds.) Electronic Proceedings of 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, 2001.
Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, M. Cole. V. John-Steiner, and S. Schribner (Eds.), Boston: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Walsham, G. “Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Future Prospects,” in A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau and J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, London: Chapman & Hall, 1997, pp. 466–480.
Walsham, G., and Han, C-K. “Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research.” Journal of Applied Systems (17), 1991, pp. 77–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Korpela, M., Mursu, A., Soriyan, A., Eerola, A., Häkkinen, H., Toivanen, M. (2004). Information Systems Research and Development by Activity Analysis and Development: Dead Horse or the Next Wave?. In: Kaplan, B., Truex, D.P., Wastell, D., Wood-Harper, A.T., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Information Systems Research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 143. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8094-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8095-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive