Abstract
This paper describes an empirical study that considered the usability of digital pens, Tablet PCs, and laptop PCs for handwritten text input by young users. The study was carried out in two parts, firstly with young children aged 7 and 8, and then with older children aged 12 and 13. The study found that digital pens were particularly well suited to older children and that the both sets of children were able to use the Tablet PC without too many errors. Digital ink technologies are often evaluated by the calculation of recognition rates and this paper exposes some of the flaws in the process of estimating recognition rates from activities involving the copying of text. With particular reference to the personalization of text, possibilities for the use of digital ink for the task of writing are explored and a new interaction, digital doodling, is presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bekker, M. M., Markopoulos, P. & Kersten-Tsikalkina, M. [2002], Interaction Design and Children, Shaker Publishing.
Carroll, J. M. [2002], Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millenium, Addison-Wesley.
Cooper, W. E. (ed.) [1983], Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting, Springer-Verlag.
Day, J. [1994], Is Good Looking Writing Good Writing?, in C. Singleton (ed.), Computers and Dyslexia: Educational Applications of New Technology, Dyslexia Computer Resource Centre, University of Hull, pp.26–36.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D. & Beale, R. [2003], Human-Computer Interaction, third edition, Prentice-Hall.
Druin, A. [2002], The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology, Behaviour & Information Technology 21(1), 1–25.
Druin, A. (ed.) [1999], The Design of Children’s Technology, Morgan-Kaufmann.
Frankish, C., Hull, R. & Morgan, P. [1995], Recognition Accuracy and User Acceptance of Pen Interfaces, in I. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson & J. Nielsen (eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’95), ACM Press, pp.503–10.
Frye, D. & Soloway, E. [1987], Interface Design: A Neglected Issue In Educational Software, in J. M. Carroll & P. P. Tanner (eds.), Proceedings of SIGCHI/GI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (CHI+GI’87), ACM Press, pp.93–7.
Garvey, J. [2002], Authenticity, Modelling and Style: Writing and ICT, in M. Williams (ed.), Unlocking Writing, David Fulton Publishers, pp.77–91.
Hartley, J., Sotto, E. & Pennebaker, J. [2003], Speaking versus Typing: A Case-study of the Effects of Using Voice — Recognition Software on Academic Correspondence, British Journal of Educational Technology 34(1), 5–16.
Huckvale, M. [1994], Purpose: The Missing Link in Speech and Handwriting Recognition, Paper presented at the AISB Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Speech and Handwriting Recognition. http://http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/mark/papers/spwrite.htm (last accessed 2005-06-07).
Kafai, Y. B. (ed.) [1990], From Barbie to Mortal Kombat, Gender and Computer Games, MIT Press.
Kress, G. [1997], Before Writing — Rethinking the Paths to Literacy, Routledge.
MacKenzie, I. S. & Chang, L. [1999], A Performance Comparison of Two Handwriting Recognizers, Interacting with Computers 11(3), 283–97.
MacKenzie, I. S. & Soukoreff, R. W. [2002a], A Character-level Error Analysis for Evaluating Text Entry Methods, in O. W. Bertelsen, S. Bødker & K. Kuuti (eds.), Proceedings of NordiCHI 2002, ACM Press, pp.241–4.
MacKenzie, I. S. & Soukoreff, R. W. [2002b], Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods, Theory and Practice, Human-Computer Interaction 17(2), 147–98.
MacKenzie, I. S. & Soukoreff, R. W. [2003], Phrase Sets for Evaluating Text Entry Techniques, in G. Cockton, P. Korhonen, E. Bergman, S. Björk, P. Collings, A. Dey, S. Draper, J. Gulliksen, T. Keinonen, J. Lazar, A. Lund, R. Molich, K. Nakakoji, L. Nigay, R. Oliveira Prates, J. Rieman & C. Snyder (eds.), CHI’03 Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp.754–5.
Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., Tse, H., Newton, D., Thompson, I., Williamson, J., Halligan, J. & Bramald, P. [1999], Ways forward with ICT: Effective Pedagogy using Information and Communication Technology for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools, Technical Report, Newcastle University.
Norman, D. A. & Fisher, D. [1982], Why Alphabetic Keyboards Are Not Easy To Use: Keyboard Layout Doesn’t Much Matter, Human Factors 24(5), 509–15.
Palmer, S. [1993], Does Computer Use Put Children’s Vision at Risk?, Journal of Research and Development in Education 26(2), 59–65.
Plamondon, R. & Srihari, S. N. [2000], On-line and Off-line Handwriting Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(1), 63–84.
Read, J. C. [2005], The ABC of CCI, Interfaces 62, 8–9.
Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J. & Casey, C. [2001], Measuring the Usability of Text Input Methods for Children, in A. Blandford, J. Vanderdonckt & P. Gray (eds.), People and Computers XV: Interaction without Frontiers (Joint Proceedings of HCI2001 and IHM2001), Springer-Verlag, pp. 559–72.
Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J. & Casey, C. [2003], A Comparison of Two On-line Handwriting Recognition Methods for Unconstrained Text Entry by Children, in P. Gray, P. Johnson & E. O’Neill (eds.), Proceedings of HCI’03: Volume 2, Research Press International for British Computer Society, pp.29–32.
Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J. & Horton, M. [2004], The Usability of Handwriting Recognition for Writing in the Primary Classroom, in S. Fincher, P. Markopoulos, D. Moore & R. Ruddle (eds.), People and Computers XVIII: Designing for Life (Proceedings of HCI’04), Springer, pp. 135–50.
Read, J., MacFarlane, S. & Casey, C. [2002], Endurability, Engagement and Expectations: Measuring Children’s Fun, in M. M. Bekker, P. Markopoulos & M. Kersten-Tsikalkina (eds.), Interaction Design and Children, Shaker Publishing, pp. 189–98.
Solomon, C. [1978], Teaching Young Children to Program in a LOGO Turtle Computer Culture, ACM SIGCUE Outlook 12(3), 20–9.
Tappert, C. C., Suen, C. Y. & Wakahara, T. [1990], The State of the Art in On-line Handwriting Recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12(8), 787–808.
Thelen, E. [1996], Motor Development, American Psychologist 51(11), 1134–52.
Turrell, G. [1999], Email — Punching Holes in Classroom Walls, in R. Selwyn & R. Dick (eds.), MAPE Focus on Communications, MAPE Publications, pp.Section C, 1.
Weikart, P. S. [1995], Purposeful Movement: Have We Overlooked the Base?, Early Childhood Connections: The Journal for Music and Movement-based Learning 1(4), 6–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Read, J.C. (2006). The Usability of Digital Ink Technologies for Children and Teenagers. In: McEwan, T., Gulliksen, J., Benyon, D. (eds) People and Computers XIX — The Bigger Picture. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-192-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-249-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)