Skip to main content

Grand Challenges in HCI: the Quest for Theory-led Design

  • Conference paper
People and Computers XIX — The Bigger Picture

Abstract

A grand challenge of theory-led design is proposed for HCI. The history and state of the art in HCI theory and knowledge is reviewed, expanding on Long & Dowell’s conception of HCI. A new approach to bridging from theory to design practice is proposed that uses generic task models as a means of locating theory-based design advice. Theory-based knowledge is also transferred to design as bridging models and as critical cognitive aspects which are applied to task models. Design of specific applications uses theory-based knowledge via mappings to generic task models and by the application of bridging models. The approach is illustrated by a case study investigation of the design issues in notifier systems and explained with a design scenario of hospital patient monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. & Angel, S. [1977], A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. & Lebiere, C. [1998], Representing Cognitive Activity in Complex Tasks, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. & Berdahl, J. L. [2000], Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, P., May, J., D, D. & Duce, D. [2000], Systems, Interactions and Macrotheory, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 222–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellotti, V., Buckingham Shum, S., MacLean, A. & Hammond, N. [1995], Multidisciplinary Modelling in HCI Design: In Theory and in Practice, in I. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson & J. Nielsen (eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCH1 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’95), ACM Press, pp. 146–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsen, O. W. & Bødker, S. [2003], Activity Theory, in J. M. Carroll (ed.), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan-Kaufmann, pp.291–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmon, M. H., Kitajima, M. & Poison, P. G. [2003], Repairing Usability Problems Identified by the Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web, in V. Bellotti, T. Erickson, G. Cockton & P. Korhonen (eds.), Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03), CHI Utters 5(1), ACM Press, pp.497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers, J. [2001], A Pattern Approach to Interaction Design, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F. P. [2003], Three Grand Challenges for Half Century Old Computer Science, Journal of the ACM 50(10), 25–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M., Gorman, N., Nilsen, E. & Hornof, A. [2004], Banner Ads Hinder Visual Search and Are Forgotten, in E. Dykstra-Erickson & M. Tscheligi (eds.), CHI’04 Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp.1139–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. & Newell, A. [1983], The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. [2000], Making Use: Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer Interactions, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. [1992], Getting Around the Task-Artefact Framework: How to Make Claims and Design by Scenario, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 10(2), 181–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J., Bickmore, J., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjalmsson, H. & Yan, H. [1999], Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: REA, in M. G. Williams & M. W. Altom (eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is the Limit (CHI’99), ACM Press, pp.520–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chewar, C. M., McCrickard, D. S. & Sutcliffe, A. G. [2004], Unpacking Critical Parameters for Interface Design: Evaluating Notification Systems with the IRC, in D. Gruen & I. McAra-McWilliams (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques (DIS’04), ACM Press, pp.279–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, I., Green, T. R. G. & Blandford, A. [2003], Ontological Sketch Models: Highlighting User-system Misfits, in E. O’Neill, P. Palanque & P. Johnson (eds.), People and Computers XVII: Designing for Society (Proceedings of HCI’03), Springer-Verlag, pp.163–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaper, D. [2002], Tasks, Scenarios and Thought, Interacting with Computers 15(4), 629–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D. & Beale, R. [2003], Human-Computer Interaction, third edition, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A. & Mancini, R. [1998], Specifying History and Back Tracking Mechanisms, in Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, Formal Approaches to Computing and Information Technology, Springer-Verlag, Chapter 1, pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, J. & Long, J. B. [1998], Conception of the Cognitive Engineering Design Problem, Ergonomics 41(2), 126–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. R. G. & Petre, M. [1996], Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A ‘Cognitive Dimensions’ Framework, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7(2), 131–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. D. & Barnard, P. J. [1993], On Defining the Requirements for Interaction, in S. Fickas & A. Finkelstein (eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’93), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.50–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. [1998], Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, E., Kadie, C. M., Paek, T. & Hovel, D. [2003], Models of Attention in Computing and Communications: From Principles to Application, Communications of the ACM 46(3), 52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., Mazalek, A. & Lee, J. [2001], Bottles as a Minimal Interface to Access Digital Information, in J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (eds.), CHI’01 Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp. 187–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO [1997], ISO 9241 International Standard. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Systems with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO [1998], ISO 14915 International Standard. Multimedia User Interface Design Software Ergonomic Requirements — Part 1: Introduction and Framework. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO [2000], ISO 14915 International Standard. Multimedia User Interface Design Software Ergonomic Requirements — Part 3: Media Combination and Selection. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, B. E. & Kieras, R. E. [1995], The GOMS Family of User Interface Analysis Techniques: Comparison and Contrast, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 3(4), 320–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. [1992], Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. E. & Meyer, D. E. [1997], An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance with Application to Human-Computer Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction 12(4), 391–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitajima, M. & Poison, P. G. [1997], A Comprehension-based Model of Exploration, Human-Computer Interaction 12(4), 345–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. & Dowell, J. [1989], Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering, in A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (eds.), People and Computers V (Proceedings of HCI’89), Cambridge University Press, pp.9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P. & Campbell, C. S. [2000], Trade-offs in Displaying Peripheral Information, in T. Turner & G. Szwillus (eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’00), CHI Letters 2(1), ACM Press, pp.241–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrickard, D. S., Catrambone, R., Chewar, C. M. & Stasko, J. T. [2003], Establishing Tradeoffs that Leverage Attention for Utility: Empirically Evaluating Information Display in Notification Systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58(5), 547–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrickard, D. S. & Chewar, C. M. [2003], Attuning Notification Design to User Goals and Attention Costs, Communications of the ACM 46(3), 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (ed.) [1996], Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W. M., Taylor, A. S., Dance, C. R. & Taylor, S. A. [2000], Performance Targets, Model and Innovation in Design of Interactive Systems, in D. Boyarski & W. A. Kellogg (eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques (DIS2000), ACM Press, pp.381–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. [1986], Cognitive Engineering, in D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.31–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. [1988], The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. [2004], Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSF [2004], Science of Design, http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=12766 (last accessed 2005-04-26). National Science Foundation: Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. [1988], The Cognitive Structure of Emotions, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P. & Card, S. [1999], Information Foraging, Psychological Review 106(4), 643–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y. & Sharp, H. (eds.) [2002], Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. [1986], Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. [1990], Human Error, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. [2004], Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Interaction, fourth edition, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasko, J., Miller, T., Pousman, Z., Plaue, C. & Ullah, O. [2004], Personalized Peripheral Information Awareness through Information Art, in N. Davies, E. Mynatt & I. Siio (eds.), UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing (Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing), Vol. 3205 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. [2000], On the Effective Use and Reuse of HCI Knowledge, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. [2002], The Domain Theory: Patterns for Knowledge and Software Reuse, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. [2003], Multimedia and Virtual Reality: Designing Multisensory User Interfaces, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. [2005], Extending Small Group Theory for Analysing Complex Systems, in C. W. Johnson (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Complexity in Design and Engineering, Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, pp. 139–48. GIST Report 2005-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G., Fickas, S., Sohlberg, M. M. & Ehlhardt, L. A. [2003], Investigating the Usability of Assistive User Interfaces, Interacting with Computers 15(4), 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. G. & Carroll, J. M. [1999], Designing Claims for Reuse in Interactive Systems Design, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 50(3), 213–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D. & Barnard, P. J. [1993], Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-modelling Depressive Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • UKCRC [2005], Grand Challenges for Computing Research, http://www.ukcrc.org.uk/grand_challenges/index.cfm (last accessed 2005-04-26). UK Computing Research Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Welie, M. [2005], Patterns in Interaction Design: Web Design Patterns, http://www.welie.com/patterns (last accessed 2005-04-26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, K. J. [1999], Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive and Healthy Computer-based Work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, C. [2000], Information Visualization: Perception for Design, Morgan-Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. [2002], Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3(2), 150–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. C., Fields, R. E. & Harrison, M. D. [2000], Analysing Human-Computer Interaction as Distributed Cognition: The Resources Model, Human-Computer Interaction 15(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sutcliffe, A. (2006). Grand Challenges in HCI: the Quest for Theory-led Design. In: McEwan, T., Gulliksen, J., Benyon, D. (eds) People and Computers XIX — The Bigger Picture. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-192-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-249-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics