Abstract
Goal-based safety standards are now a reality. As well as confidently satisfying the mandatory requirements laid down in these standards, there are a number of other secondary factors that influence the confidence a regulator or assessor has in any safety case produced. These factors include novelty of argument approach, experience of stakeholders and scale of the system and safety case. Currently, the certainty with which requirements are satisfied and the consideration of the other confidence factors often remains implicit within the certification process. In a goal-based safety case regime, users and regulators require intelligent customers who are aware of these issues and can explicitly consider them during the production of their safety case to increase the confidence of all stakeholders involved. Standards, guidance and other publications have covered in detail the structure and content of safety cases and this paper does not intend to repeat this information. Instead, this paper brings together and discusses the other confidence factors and approaches to managing them within the safety case development process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bishop P, Bloomfield R, Emmet L, Jones C, Froome P (1998). Adelard Safety Case Development Manual, Adelard, 1998
CAA (1999). Regulatory Objective for Software Safety Assurance in Air Traffic Service Equipment SW01. Civil Aviation Authority, UK, 1999
Lipshitz R & Strauss O (1997). Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1997; 69-2:149–163
Greenwell W S, Strunk E A, Knight J C (2004). Failure Analysis and the Safety-Case Lifecycle. Proceedings of the 7th IFIP Working Conference on Human Error, Safety and System Development (HESSD), Toulouse, France, August 2004. Ed. C W Johnson and P Palanque. Boston: Kluwer, 2004
Kelly T P (1998). Arguing Safety — A Systematic Approach to Safety Case Management, DPhil Thesis YCST99-05, Department of Computer Science, University of York, UK, 1998
McDermid J, Kelly T, Weaver R (2005). Goal-Based Safety Standards: Opportunities and Challenges. Proceedings of the 23rd International System Safety Conference, San Diego, USA, August 2005
Mir N H (2005). Web Based Integrated Safety Management Groupware. MSc Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, UK, 2005
MoD (2004a). Defence Standard 00-56, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems-Part 1 Requirements, Issue 3, UK Ministry of Defence, 2004
MoD (2004b). Defence Standard 00-56, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems-Part 2 Guidance on Establishing a Means of Complying with Part 1, Issue 3, UK Ministry of Defence, 2004
MODISA (2004). Guidance for Integrated Project Teams for Use in Contracting for Independent Safety Auditor (ISA) Services. STG/181/1/9/1, Safety Management Offices Group, Ministry of Defence, 2004
Thunnissen D P (2005). Propagating and Mitigating Uncertainty in the Design of Complex Multidisciplinary Systems. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasedena, California, 2005
Weaver R A (2003). The Safety of Software — Constructing and Assuring Arguments. PhD Thesis, Green Report YCST 2004/01, Department of Computer Science University of York, York UK, 2003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Weaver, R., Kelly, T., Mayo, P. (2006). Gaining Confidence in Goal-based Safety Cases. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Developments in Risk-based Approaches to Safety. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-447-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-447-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-333-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-447-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)