Skip to main content

Gaining Confidence in Goal-based Safety Cases

  • Conference paper
Developments in Risk-based Approaches to Safety

Abstract

Goal-based safety standards are now a reality. As well as confidently satisfying the mandatory requirements laid down in these standards, there are a number of other secondary factors that influence the confidence a regulator or assessor has in any safety case produced. These factors include novelty of argument approach, experience of stakeholders and scale of the system and safety case. Currently, the certainty with which requirements are satisfied and the consideration of the other confidence factors often remains implicit within the certification process. In a goal-based safety case regime, users and regulators require intelligent customers who are aware of these issues and can explicitly consider them during the production of their safety case to increase the confidence of all stakeholders involved. Standards, guidance and other publications have covered in detail the structure and content of safety cases and this paper does not intend to repeat this information. Instead, this paper brings together and discusses the other confidence factors and approaches to managing them within the safety case development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bishop P, Bloomfield R, Emmet L, Jones C, Froome P (1998). Adelard Safety Case Development Manual, Adelard, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • CAA (1999). Regulatory Objective for Software Safety Assurance in Air Traffic Service Equipment SW01. Civil Aviation Authority, UK, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R & Strauss O (1997). Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1997; 69-2:149–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwell W S, Strunk E A, Knight J C (2004). Failure Analysis and the Safety-Case Lifecycle. Proceedings of the 7th IFIP Working Conference on Human Error, Safety and System Development (HESSD), Toulouse, France, August 2004. Ed. C W Johnson and P Palanque. Boston: Kluwer, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly T P (1998). Arguing Safety — A Systematic Approach to Safety Case Management, DPhil Thesis YCST99-05, Department of Computer Science, University of York, UK, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermid J, Kelly T, Weaver R (2005). Goal-Based Safety Standards: Opportunities and Challenges. Proceedings of the 23rd International System Safety Conference, San Diego, USA, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir N H (2005). Web Based Integrated Safety Management Groupware. MSc Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, UK, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • MoD (2004a). Defence Standard 00-56, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems-Part 1 Requirements, Issue 3, UK Ministry of Defence, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • MoD (2004b). Defence Standard 00-56, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems-Part 2 Guidance on Establishing a Means of Complying with Part 1, Issue 3, UK Ministry of Defence, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • MODISA (2004). Guidance for Integrated Project Teams for Use in Contracting for Independent Safety Auditor (ISA) Services. STG/181/1/9/1, Safety Management Offices Group, Ministry of Defence, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunnissen D P (2005). Propagating and Mitigating Uncertainty in the Design of Complex Multidisciplinary Systems. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasedena, California, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver R A (2003). The Safety of Software — Constructing and Assuring Arguments. PhD Thesis, Green Report YCST 2004/01, Department of Computer Science University of York, York UK, 2003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weaver, R., Kelly, T., Mayo, P. (2006). Gaining Confidence in Goal-based Safety Cases. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Developments in Risk-based Approaches to Safety. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-447-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-447-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-333-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-447-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics