Skip to main content

Scaleability in Planning

  • Conference paper
Recent Advances in AI Planning (ECP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1809))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores the performance of three planners, viz. parcPLAN, IPP and Blackbox, on a variant of the standard blocks-world problem. The variant problem has a restricted number of table positions, and the number of arms can vary (from 1 upwards). This type of problem is typical of many real world planning problems, where resources form a significant component. The empirical studies reveal that least commitment planning, as implemented in parcPLAN, is far more effective than the strategies in IPP and Blackbox. But the studies also reveal a serious limitation on the scaleability of parcPLAN’s algorithm.

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Grant No. GR/L71919

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.F., Koomen, J.A.: Planning Using a Temporal World Model. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1983, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 741–747 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, A.L., Furst, M.L.: Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90, 281–300 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. ECRC. ECLiPSe User Manual. European Computer Industry Research Centre, Munich, 4.1 edn. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. El-Kholy, A., Richards, B.: Temporal and Resource Reasoning in Planning: the parcPLAN approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1996), Budapest, Hungary, pp. 614–618. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. El-Kholy, A.: Resource Feasibility in Planning. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, N., Nau, D.S.: On the Complexity of Blocks-World Planning. Artificial Intelligence 56, 223–254 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Joslin, D., Pollack, M.E.: Is early “commitment” in plan generation ever a goodidea? In: Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1996), Portland, Oregon, pp. 1188–1193 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kautz, H., Selman, B.: Blackbox: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving. In: AIPS 1998 Workshop on Planning as Combinatorial Search, pp. 58–60 (June 1998), Available from http://www.research.att.com/~kautz/blackbox/

  9. Koehler, J., Nebel, B., Hoffmann, J., Dimopoulos, Y.: Extending Planning Graphs to an adl Subset. In: Steel, S. (ed.) ECP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1348, pp. 273–285. Springer, Heidelberg (1997), Available from http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~koehler/ipp.html

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lever, J.M., Richards, B.: ParcPLAN: a Planning Architecture with Parallel Actions, Resources and Constraints. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 213–222 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liatsos, V., Richards, B.: Planning benchmarks on a blocks world variant, Available from http://www.icparc.ic.ac.uk/parcPlan/ecp99/

  12. McDermott, D., et al.: PDDL-The Planning Domain Definition Language, version 1.2. Technical Report CVC TR-98-003, Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control, Yale University (October 1998), Available from http://www.cs.yale.edu/HTML/YALE/CS/HyPlans/mcdermott.html

  13. El Sakkout, H., Richards, T., Wallace, M.: Minimal Perturbation in Dynamic Scheduling. In: Prade, H. (ed.) 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ECAI 1998. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. El Sakkout, H., Wallace, M.: Probe Backtrack Search for Minimal Perturbation in Dynamic Scheduling, To appear in Constraints journal (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava, B., Kambhampati, S.: Scaling up Planning by teasing out Resource Scheduling. Technical Report ASU CSE TR 99-005, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5406 (1999), Available from http://rakaposhi.eas.asu.edu/yochan.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liatsos, V., Richards, B. (2000). Scaleability in Planning. In: Biundo, S., Fox, M. (eds) Recent Advances in AI Planning. ECP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1809. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10720246_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10720246_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44657-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics