Skip to main content

Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1867))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given a finite set \(\mathcal{C} := \{ C_1, \ldots, C_n\}\) of description logic concepts, we are interested in computing the subsumption hierarchy of all least common subsumers of subsets of \(\mathcal{C}\). This hierarchy can be used to support the bottom-up construction and the structuring of description logic knowledge bases. The point is to compute this hierarchy without having to compute the least common subsumer for all subsets of \(\mathcal{C}\). We will show that methods from formal concept analysis developed for computing concept lattices can be employed for this purpose.

This work was partially supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant No. GRK 185/3-98.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F.: Computing a Minimal Representation of the Subsumption Lattice of all Conjunctions of Concepts Defined in a Terminology. In: Proceedings of KRUSE 1995(1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Küsters, R.: Computing the least common subsumer and the most specific concept in the presence of cyclic \(\mathcal{ALN}\)-concept descriptions. In: Herzog, O. (ed.) KI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1504. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Molitor, R.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics with existential restrictions. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1999. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borgida, A., Patel-Schneider, P.: A semantics and complete algorithm for subsumption in the Classic description logic. J. Artificial Intelligence Research 1 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, W.W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the Classic description logic: Theoretical and experimental results. In: Proceedings of KR 1994. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Hollunder, B., Nutt, W., Spaccamela, A.M.: The complexity of existential quantification in concept languages. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dowling, W.F., Gallier, J.H.: Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional Horn formulae. J. Logic Programming 3 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duquenne, V.: Contextual implications between attributes and some representational properties for finite lattices. In: Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse. B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frazier, M., Pitt, L.: Classic learning. Machine Learning 25 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ganter, B.: Finding all closed sets: A general approach. Order 8 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis – Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks, I.: The FaCT system. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1397, p. 307. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marquardt, W.: Trends in computer-aided process modeling. Computers and Chemical Engineering 20(6/7) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nassiri, M.: Berechnung einer erweiterten Subsumtionshierarchie. Diploma thesis, RWTH Aachen, Germany (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sattler, U.: Terminological Knowledge Representation Systems in a Process Engineering Application. PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stumme, G.: Exploration Tools in Formal Concept Analysis. In: Proceedings of OSDA 1995. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, vol. 8. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stumme, G.: The concept classification of a terminology extended by conjunction and disjunction. In: Foo, N.Y., Göbel, R. (eds.) PRICAI 1996. LNCS, vol. 1114. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stumme, G., Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung — Methoden und Anwendungen. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Vogt, F., Wille, R.: TOSCANA - A graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data. In: Tamassia, R., Tollis, I.G. (eds.) GD 1994. LNCS, vol. 894. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Molitor, R. (2000). Building and Structuring Description Logic Knowledge Bases Using Least Common Subsumers and Concept Analysis. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. ICCS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1867. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10722280_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10722280_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67859-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44663-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics