Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1867))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Internet is a giant semiotic system. It is a massive collection of Peirce’s three kinds of signs: icons, which show the form of something; indices, which point to something; and symbols, which represent something according to some convention. But current proposals for ontologies and metadata have overlooked some of the most important features of signs. A sign has three aspects: it is (1) an entity that represents (2) another entity to (3) an agent. By looking only at the signs themselves, some metadata proposals have lost sight of the entities they represent and the agents – human, animal, or robot – which interpret them. With its three branches of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, semiotics provides guidelines for organizing and using signs to represent something to someone for some purpose. Besides representation, semiotics also supports methods for translating patterns of signs intended for one purpose to other patterns intended for different but related purposes. This article shows how the fundamental semiotic primitives are represented in semantically equivalent notations for logic, including controlled natural languages and various computer languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tim, B.-L., Fielding, R., Masinter, L. (eds.): Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax (1998); Internet RFC 2396

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tim, B.-L.: The Semantic Toolbox: Building Semantics on top of XML-RDF (1999), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Toolbox.html

  3. Bray, T.: RDF and Metadata (1998), http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/98/06/rdf.html

  4. Bray, T., Hollander, D., Layman, A. (eds.): Namespaces in XML (1999); W3 TR REC-xml-names

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cyre, W.R., Balachandar, S., Thakar, A.: Knowledge visualization from conceptual structures. In: Tepfenhart, W.M., Dick, J.P., Sowa, J.F. (eds.) ICCS 1994. LNCS, vol. 835, pp. 275–292. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cyre, W.R.: Capture, integration, and analysis of digital system requirements with conceptual graphs. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering 9(1), 8–23 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cyre, W.R., Hess, J., Gunawan, A., Sojitra, R.: A Rapid Modeling Tool for Virtual Prototypes. In: 1999 Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping, Clearwater, FL (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frege, G.: Begriffsschrift (1879); English Translation in van Heijenoort, J.(ed.): From Frege to Gödel, pp. 1–82. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs, N.E., Schwertel, U., Schwitter, R.: Attempto Controlled English – not just another logic specification language. In: Flener, P. (ed.) LOPSTR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1559, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuchs, N.E., Schwertel, U., Schwitter, R.: Attempto Controlled English (ACE), Language Manual, Version 3.0, Technical Report ifi-99.03, University of Zurich (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Genesereth, M.R., Fikes, R. (eds.): Knowledge Interchange Format (KIF) (1998), draft proposed American National Standard, NCITS.T2/98-004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gerbé, O., Perron, M.: Presentation definition language using conceptual graphs. In: Ellis, G., Rich, W., Levinson, R., Sowa, J.F. (eds.) ICCS 1995. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 954. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerbé, O., Guay, B., Perron, M.: Using conceptual graphs for methods modeling. In: Eklund, P., Mann, G.A., Ellis, G. (eds.) ICCS 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1115, pp. 161–174. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerbé, O.: Conceptual graphs for corporate knowledge management. In: Delugach, H.S., Keeler, M.A., Searle, L., Lukose, D., Sowa, J.F. (eds.) ICCS 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1257, pp. 474–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerbé, O., Keller, R.K., Mineau, G.W.: Conceptual graphs for representing business processes in corporate memories. In: Mugnier, M.-L., Chein, M. (eds.) ICCS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1453, pp. 401–415. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerbé, O., Kerhervé, B.: Modeling and metamodeling requirements for knowledge management. In: Proc. of OOPSLA 1998 Workshops, Vancouver (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gerbé, O.: Un Mod‘ele uniforme pour la Modélisation et la Métamodélisation d’une Mémoire d’Entreprise, PhD Dissertation, Département d’informatique et de recherché opérationelle, Université de Montréal (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heflin, J., Hendler, J., Luke, S.: SHOE: A Knowledge Representation Language for Internet Applications, Technical Report CS-TR-4078 (UMIACS TR-99-71), Dept. of Computer Science, University of Maryland at College Park (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamp, H.: Events, discourse representations, and temporal references. Langages 64, 39–64 (1981a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamp, H.: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: Groenendijk, J.A.G., Janssen, T.M.V., Stokhof, M.B.J. (eds.) Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, pp. 277–322 (1981b)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lassila, O., Swick, R.R. (eds.): Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdfsyntax

  23. Ogden, C.K., Richards, I.A.: The Meaning of Meaning. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York (1923) (8th edn. 1946)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peirce, C.S.: On the algebra of logic. American Journal of Mathematics 7, 180–202 (1885)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Peirce, C.S.(CP): Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., Burk, A. (eds.) 8 vols. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931-1958)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Phipps, S.: Meaning, not Markup. XML Journal 1(1), 66 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rassinoux, A.-M.: Extraction et Représentation de la Connaissance tirée de Textes Médicaux. Éditions Systèmes et Information, Geneva (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rassinoux, A.-M., Baud, R.H., Lovis, C., Wagner, J.C., Scherrer, J.-R.: Tuning up conceptual graph representation for multilingual natural language processing in medicine. In: Mugnier, M.-L., Chein, M. (eds.) ICCS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1453, pp. 390–397. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. St. Laurent, S.: XML: A Primer, 2nd edn. M & T Books, Foster City (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. de Saussure, F.: Cours de Linguistique Générale (1916); Translated by Baskin, W.: Course in General Linguistics. Philosophical Library, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schwitter, R.: Kontrolliertes Englisch für Anforderungsspezifikationen. Studentdruckerei, Zurich (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Skuce, D., Lethbridge, T.: CODE4: Aunified system for managing conceptual knowledge. International J. of Human-Computer Studies 42, 413–451 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Skuce, D.: Intelligent knowledge management: integrating documents, knowledge bases, and linguistic knowledge. In: Proceedings of KAW 1998, Calgary (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Skuce, D.: Integrating web-based documents, shared knowledge bases, and information retrieval for user help. Computational Intelligence 16(1) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Sowa, J.F. (ed.): Conceptual Graphs (1998); draft proposed American National Standard, NCITS.T2/98-003

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sowa, J.F., Way, E.C.: Implementing a semantic interpreter using conceptual graphs. IBM Journal of Research and Development 30(1), 57–69 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John F. Sowa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Algebra, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany

    Bernhard Ganter

  2. Département d’informatique et de génie logiciel, Université Laval, Pavillon Adrien-Pouliot, 1065, av. de la Médecine, G1V 0A6, Quebec City, Québec, Canada

    Guy W. Mineau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sowa, J.F. (2000). Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. ICCS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1867. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10722280_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10722280_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67859-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44663-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics