Skip to main content

Optimizing the Evaluation of XPath Using Description Logics

  • Conference paper
Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2004, WLP 2004)

Abstract

The growing use of XML in commercial as well as non-commercial domains to transport information poses new challenges to concepts to access this information. Common ways to access parts of a document use XPath-expressions. We provide a transformation of DTDs into a knowledge base in Description Logic. We use reasoning capabilities grounded in description logics to decide if a given XPath can be satisfied by a document, and to guide the search of XML-Processors into possibly successful branches of the document, thus avoiding parts of the document that will not yield results. The extension towards object oriented subclassing schemes opens this approach towards OODB-queries. In contrast to other approaches we do not use any kind of graph representing the document structure, and no steps towards incorporation of the XML/OODB-processor itself will be taken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Sattler, U.: An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica 69, 5–40 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner, P.: Hyper Tableaux — The Next Generation. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1397, pp. 60–76. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgartner, P., Furbach, U., Groß-Hardt, M., Kleemann, T.: Model Based Deduction for Database Schema Reasoning. In: Biundo, S., Frühwirth, T., Palm, G. (eds.) KI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3238, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner, P., Furbach, U., Niemelä, I.: Hyper Tableaux. In: Orłowska, E., Alferes, J.J., Moniz Pereira, L. (eds.) JELIA 1996. LNCS. vol. 1126. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E.: Extensible markup language (xml) 1.0, w3c recommendation, 2nd edn., (October 6, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bry, F., Schaffert, S.: Towards a declarative query and transformation language for XML and semistructured data: Simulation unification. In: Stuckey, P.J. (ed.) ICLP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2401, p. 255. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M.: Queries and constraints on semi-structured data. In: Jarke, M., Oberweis, A. (eds.) CAiSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1626, pp. 434–438. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M.: Representing and reasoning on XML Documents: a Description Logic Approach. Journal of Logic and Computation, 295–318 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dix, J., Furbach, U., Niemelä, I.: Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Towards Efficient Calculi and Implementations. In: Voronkov, A., Robinson, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 1121–1234. Elsevier-Science-Press, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: RACER system description. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, p. 701. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO8879:1986. Information processing – text and office systems – standard generalized markup language (sgml) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Swartout, B.: Description-logic knowledge representation system specification (November 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. W3C. XML Schema - part 0 to part 2 (2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0,-1,-2

  15. W3C. XML path language (XPath) 2.0 (2002), http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20

  16. Wernhard, C.: System Description: KRHyper. Fachberichte Informatik 14–2003, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Institut für Informatik (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baumgartner, P., Furbach, U., Gross-Hardt, M., Kleemann, T. (2005). Optimizing the Evaluation of XPath Using Description Logics. In: Seipel, D., Hanus, M., Geske, U., Bartenstein, O. (eds) Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management. INAP WLP 2004 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3392. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11415763_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11415763_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25560-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32124-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics