Skip to main content

Using Decision Tree Models and Diversity Measures in the Selection of Ensemble Classification Models

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 3541))

Abstract

This paper describes a contingency-based approach to ensemble classification. Motivated by a business marketing problem, we explore the use of decision tree models, along with diversity measures and other elements of the task domain, to identify highly-performing ensemble classification models. Working from generated data sets, we found that 1) decision tree models can significantly improve the identification of highly-performing ensembles, and 2) the input parameters for a decision tree are dependent on the characteristics and demands of the decision problem, as well as the objectives of the decision maker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, K.M., Pazzani, M.J.: Error Reduction through Learning Multiple Descriptions. Machine Learning 24(3), 173–202 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24(2), 123–140 (1996)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, P.K., Stolfo, S.J.: On the Accuracy of Meta-learning for Scalable Data Mining. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 8, 5–28 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davenport, T.H.: Saving IT’s Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. Harvard Business Review, pp. 119-131 (March-April 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dietterich, T.G.: Machine Learning Research: Four Current Directions. AI Magazine 18(4), 97–136 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dietterich, T.G.: An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees: Bagging, Boosting, and Randomization. Machine Learning 40(2), 139–157 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gal-Or, E., Gal-Or, M., May, J.H., Spangler, W.E.: Targeted Advertising Strategies on Television. University of Pittsburgh Working Paper (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gal-Or, M., May, J.H., Spangler, W.E.: Assessing The Predictive Accuracy of Diversity Measures with Domain-Dependent. Asymmetric Misclassification Costs. Information Fusion 6(1), 37–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., Matas, J.: On Combining Classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J.: Measures of Diversity in Classifier Ensembles and Their Relationship with the Ensemble Accuracy. Machine Learning 51(2), 181–207 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J., Shipp, C.A., Duin, R.P.W.: Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion. Pattern Analysis Applications 6, 22–31 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam, L., Suen, C.Y.: Application of Majority Voting to Pattern Recognition: An Analysis of Its Behavior and Performance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 27(5), 553–568 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Opitz, D., Maclin, R.: Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11, 169–198 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Partridge, D., Krzanowski, W.: Software Diversity: Practical Statistics for its Measurement and Exploitation. Information and Software Technology 39, 707–712 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shipp, C.A., Kuncheva, L.I.: Relationships between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers. Information Fusion 3(2), 135–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitaker, C.J., Kuncheva, L.I.: Examining the relationship between majority vote accuracy and diversity in bagging and boosting. School of Informatics. University of Wales, Bangor (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gal-Or, M., May, J.H., Spangler, W.E. (2005). Using Decision Tree Models and Diversity Measures in the Selection of Ensemble Classification Models. In: Oza, N.C., Polikar, R., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11494683_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11494683_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26306-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31578-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics