Abstract
In the context of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, there is a potential for adapting either content or its sequence to student as to enhance the learning experience. Recent theories propose the use of team-working environments to improve even further this experience. In this paper an effective matching algorithm is presented in the context of peer reviewing applied to an educational setting. The problem is formulated as an optimization problem to search a solution that satisfies a set of given criteria modeled as “profiles”. These profiles represent regions of the solution space to be either favored or avoided when searching for a solution. The proposed technique was deployed in a first semester computer engineering course and proved to be both effective and well received by the students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.): ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Gehringer, E.F.: Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review. In: Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE (2000)
Gehringer, E.F.: Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. In: Proc. of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, pp. 139–143 (2001)
Ward, A., Sitthiworachart, J., Joy, M.: Aspects of web-based peer assessment systems for teaching and learning computer programming. In: IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, pp. 292–297 (2004)
Calibrated peer review (2004), http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu
Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68, 249–276 (1998)
Gehringer, E.F.: Assignment and quality control of peer reviewers. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2001)
Crespo, R.M., Pardo, A., Delgado Kloos, C.: An adaptive strategy for peer review. In: Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE (2004)
Inaba, A., Mizoguchi, R.: Learners’ roles and predictable educational benefits in collaborative learning. an ontological approach to support design and analysis of cscl. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 285–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Feldgen, M., Clúa, O.: Games as a motivation for freshman students to learn programming. In: Frontiers in Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE (2004)
Nelson, S.: Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates. In: Frontiers in Education Conf. (2000)
Gehringer, E.F., Cui, Y.: An effective strategy for the dynamic mapping of peer reviewers. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2002)
Merriam-webster online dictionary (2005), http://www.m-w.com
Laramée, F.D.: Genetic Algorithms: Evolving the Perfect Troll. In: AI game programming wisdom, pp. 629–639. Charles River Media, Hingham (2002)
Koza, J.: Genetic Programming-On the programming of the computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Crespo, R.M., Pardo, A., Pérez, J.P.S., Kloos, C.D. (2005). An Algorithm for Peer Review Matching Using Student Profiles Based on Fuzzy Classification and Genetic Algorithms. In: Ali, M., Esposito, F. (eds) Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3533. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11504894_95
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11504894_95
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26551-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31893-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)