Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3578))

Abstract

This research investigates transitive dependence relations, an extension of direct dependence relations, in multi-agent systems. In this paper, action dependence relations are employed to deduct transitive dependence relations from direct dependence relations. Transitive dependence is useful in representation, analysis, and social relations reasoning between agents, groups, organizations, etc. Furthermore, in this paper, dependence relations are differentiated by both dependence property and dependence degree, which is useful in quantitative social reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zlotkin, G., Rosenschein, J.S.: Coalition, cryptography, and stability: mechanisms for coalition formation in task oriented domains. In: Proc. of AAAI 1994, pp. 432–437 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Understanding ”why” in software process modeling, analysis, and design. In: Proc. of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, Sorrento, Italy, California, pp. 159–168 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Demazeau, Y., Castelfranchi, C.: A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In: Proc. of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 188–192 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sichman, J.S., Conte, R.: Multi-sgent dependence by dependence graphs. In: Proc. of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 483–492 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Inverno, M., Luck, M.: A formal view of social dependence networks. In: Zhang, C., Lukose, D. (eds.) DAI 1995. LNCS, vol. 1087, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boella, G., et al.: Power and dependence relations in groups of agents. In: Proc. of IAT 2004, pp. 246–252 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alonso, E.: An individualistic approach to social action in Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 11(4), 519–530

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foster, I., Jennings, N. R., Kesselman, C.: Brain meets brawn: why Grid and agents need each other. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi- Agent Systems, pp. 8–15 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

An, B., Miao, C., Tang, L., Li, S., Cheng, D. (2005). Toward Transitive Dependence in MAS. In: Gallagher, M., Hogan, J.P., Maire, F. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2005. IDEAL 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3578. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26972-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31693-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics