Skip to main content

Meaning in Context

  • Conference paper
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3554))

Abstract

A model for context-dependent natural language semantics is proposed and formalized in terms of possible worlds. The meaning of a sentence depends on context and at the same time affects that context representing the knowledge about the world collected from a discourse. The model fits well with a “flat” semantic representation as first proposed by Hobbs (1985), consisting basically of a conjunction of atomic predications in which all variables are existentially quantified with the widest possible scope; in our framework, this provides very concise semantic terms as compared with other representations. There is a natural correspondence between the possible worlds semantics and a constraint solver, and it is shown how such a semantics can be defined using the programming language of Constraint Handling Rules (Frühwirth, 1995). Discourse analysis is clearly a process of abduction in this framework, and it is shown that the mentioned constraint solvers serve as effective and efficient abductive engines for the purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdennadher, S., Christiansen, H.: An Experimental CLP Platform for Integrity Constraints and Abduction. In: Larsen, H.L., Kacprzyk, J., Zadrozny, S. (eds.) Proceedings of FQAS 2000, Flexible Query Answering Systems. Advances in Soft Computing series, pp. 141–152. Physica-Verlag (Springer), Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abdennadher, S., Schütz, H.: CHR \(^\lor \): A flexible query language. In: Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1495, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Christiansen, H.: Open theories and abduction for context and accommodation. In: Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Brézillon, P., Benercetti, M., Castellani, F. (eds.) CONTEXT 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1688, pp. 455–458. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Christiansen, H.: Abductive Language Interpretation as Bottom-up Deduction. In: Wintner, S. (ed.) Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, Proceedings of the 2002 workshop, Roskilde University, Comp. Sci. Dept. Datalogiske Skrifter, vol. 92, pp. 33–47 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christiansen, H.: CHR Grammars web site. Source text, manual, and examples (2002), http://www.ruc.dk/~henning/chrg

  6. Christiansen, H.: CHR grammars. International Journal on Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, special issue on Constraint Handling Rules (to appear, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christiansen, H., Dahl, V.: Assumptions and Abduction in Prolog. In: Muñoz-Hernández, S., Gómez-Perez, J.M., Hofstedt, P. (eds.) Proceedings of WLPE 2004: 14th Workshop on Logic Programming Environments and MultiCPL 2004: Third Workshop on Multiparadigm Constraint Programming Languages Workshop Proceedings, Saint-Malo, France, September 2004, pp. 87–101 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Console, L., Theseider Dupré, D., Torasso, P.: On the Relationship between Abduction and Deduction. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(5), 661–690 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahl, V., Tarau, P.: From Assumptions to Meaning. Canadian Artificial Intelligence 42 (Spring 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frühwirth, T.W.: Theory and Practice of Constraint Handling Rules. Journal of Logic Programming 37(1–3), 95–138 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hobbs, J.: Ontological Promiscuity. In: Proceedings of the 23rd conference on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA, July 8-12, pp. 61–69 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M.E., Appelt, D.E., Martin, P.: Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63, 69–142 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaffar, J., Maher, M.J.: Constraint logic programming: A survey. Journal of logic programming 19, 20, 503–581 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kakas, A.C., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: The role of abduction in logic programming. In: Gabbay, D.M., Hogger, C.J., Robinson, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. 5, pp. 235–324. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kazantzakis, N.: \(B\acute{\iota} o\varsigma\;\; \kappa\alpha\iota\;\; \Pi o\lambda\iota\tau\epsilon\acute{\iota}\alpha\;\; \tau o\upsilon\;\; A\lambda\acute{\epsilon}\xi\eta\;\; Zo\rho\mu\pi\acute{\alpha}\). [Eng.: Life and career of Alexis Zorbas.] (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mishler, E.G.: Meaning in Context: Is there any other Kind? Harward Educational Review 49(1), 1–19 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Montague, R.: Formal philosophy. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  18. Penn, J.R.: The Other Syntax: Approaching Natural Language Semantics through Logical Form Composition. In: Christiansen, H., Skadhauge, P.R., Villadsen, J. (eds.) CSLP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3438, pp. 48–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Pereira, F.C.N., Warren, D.H.D.: Definite clause grammars for language analysis. A survey of the formalism and a comparison with augmented transition grammars. Artificial Intelligence 10(3-4), 165–176 (1980)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Rieger, C.: Conceptual overlays: A mechanism for the interpretation of sentence meaning in context. In: Proc. IJCAI 1975, pp. 143–150 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stalnaker, R.: On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7, 3–19 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, 1989th edn. Gramercy Books, dilithium Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Christiansen, H., Dahl, V. (2005). Meaning in Context. In: Dey, A., Kokinov, B., Leake, D., Turner, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3554. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26924-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31890-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics