Abstract
When agents coordinate according to the principles of teamwork they can flexibly, robustly and reliably achieve complex goals in complex, dynamic and even hostile environments. An emerging standard for building such teams is via the use of proxies, which encapsulate domain independent teamwork algorithms in a software module that works closely with a domain specific person, agent or robot and other proxies to create a team. Succesful, previous generations of proxies and teamwork algorithms were limited to small teams because of their reliance on accurate models of the team and task state. By developing new algorithms that rely on probabilistic models we have been able to build teams that are orders of magnitude larger than before. However, key challenges remain before such teams can be deployed in real-world environments, including the need for languages to specify plans for such teams and ways of modeling and predicting team performance in new domains.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barabasi, A.-L., Bonabeau, E.: Scale free networks. In: Scientific American, pp. 60–69 (May 2003)
Bryson, J.: Hierarchy and sequence vs. full parallelism in action selection. In: Intelligent Virtual Agents 2, pp. 113–125 (1999)
Castelpietra, C., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D., Piaggio, M., Scalzo, A., Sgorbissa, A.: Coordination among heterogenous robotic soccer players. In: Proceedings of IROS 2002 (2002)
Chalupsky, H., Gil, Y., Knoblock, C.A., Lerman, K., Oh, J., Pynadath, D.V., Russ, T.A., Tambe, M.: Electric Elves: Agent technology for supporting human organizations. AI Magazine 23(2), 11–24 (2002)
Cockburn, D., Jennings, N.: Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In: Chapter ARCHON: A Distributed Artificial Intelligence System For Industrial Applications, pp. 319–344. Wiley, Chichester (1996)
Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. Nous 25(4), 487–512 (1991)
Decker, K., Li, J.: Coordinated hospital patient scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), Paris, July 1998, pp. 104–111 (1998)
Decugis, V., Ferber, J.: Action selection in an autonomous agent with a hierarchical distributed reactive planning architecture. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents (1998)
Estlin, T., Mann, T., Gray, A., Rapideau, G., Castano, R., Chein, S., Mjolsness, E.: An integrated system for multi-rover scientific exploration. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1999 (1999)
Farinelli, A., Scerri, P., Tambe, M.: Building large-scale robot systems: Distributed role assignment in dynamic, uncertain domains. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Representations and Approaches for Time-Critical Decentralized Resource, Role and Task Allocation (2003)
Fitzpatrick, S., Meertens, L.: Stochastic Algorithms: Foundations and Applications. In: Steinhöfel, K. (ed.) SAGA 2001. LNCS, vol. 2264, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Goldberg, D., Cicirello, V., Dias, M.B., Simmons, R., Smith, S., Stentz (Tony), A.: Market-based multi-robot planning in a distributed layered architecture. In: Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata: Proceedings from the 2003 International Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems, vol. 2, pp. 27–38. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)
Grosz, B., Kraus, S.: Collaborative plans for complex group actions. Artificial Intelligence 86, 269–358 (1996)
Horling, B., Mailler, R., Sims, M., Lesser, V.: Using and maintaining organization in a large-scale distributed sensor network. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control, AAMAS 2003 (2003)
Jennings, N.: The archon systems and its applications. Project Report (1995)
Jennings, N.R.: Specification and implementation of a belief-desire-joint-intention architecture for collaborative problem solving. Intl. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2(3), 289–318 (1993)
Kinny, D.: The distributed multi-agent reasoning system architecture and language specification. Technical report, Australian Artificial intelligence institute, Melbourne, Australia (1993)
Kitano, H., Asada, M., Kuniyoshi, Y., Noda, I., Osawa, E., Matsubara, H.: RoboCup: A challenge problem for AI. AI Magazine 18(1), 73–85 (1997)
Laird, J., Jones, R., Nielsen, P.: Coordinated behavior of computer generated forces in TacAir-Soar. In: Proceedings of the fourth conference on computer generated forces and behavioral representation, Orlando, Florida, pp. 325–332 (1994)
Lesser, V., Atighetchi, M., Benyo, B., Horling, B., Raja, A., Vincent, R., Wagner, T., Xuan, P., Zhang, S.: The UMASS intelligent home project. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents, Seattle, USA, pp. 291–298 (1999)
Liao, E., Scerri, P., Sycara, K.: A framework for very large teams. In: AAMAS 2004 Workshop on Coalitions and Teams (2004)
Modi, P.J., Shen, W., Tambe, M.: Distributed constraint optimization and its application. Technical Report ISI-TR-509, University of Southern California/Information Sciences Institute (2002)
Nair, R., Ito, T., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: Task allocation in robocup rescue simulation domain. In: Kaminka, G.A., Lima, P.U., Rojas, R. (eds.) RoboCup 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2752, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Vincent, R., Scerri, P., Mailler, R. (eds.): Proceedings of AAMAS 2004 Workshop on Challenges in the Coordination of Large Scale MultiAgent Systems (2004)
Pynadath, D., Tambe, M.: Multiagent teamwork: Analyzing the optimality and complexity of key theories and models. In: First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS 2002 (2002)
Rich, C., Sidner, C.: COLLAGEN: When agents collaborate with people. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Agents 1997 (1997)
Rybski, P., Stoeter, S., Erickson, M., Gini, M., Hougen, D., Papanikolopoulos, N.: A team of robotic agents for surveillance. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on autonomous agents, pp. 9–16 (2000)
Scerri, P., Farinelli, A., Okamoto, S., Tambe, M.: Allocating roles in extreme teams. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2004, Poster Presentation (2004)
Scerri, P., Pynadath, D., Tambe, M.: Towards adjustable autonomy for the real world. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17, 171–228 (2002)
Scerri, P., Pynadath, D.V., Johnson, L., Rosenbloom, P., Schurr, N., Si, M., Tambe, M.: A prototype infrastructure for distributed robot-agent-person teams. In: The Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2003)
Scerri, P., Sycara, K., Tambe, M.: Adjustable autonomy in the context of coordination. In: AIAA 3rd “Unmanned Unlimited” Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit (2004) (Invited Paper)
Scerri, P., Xu, Y., Liao, E., Lai, J., Sycara, K.: Scaling teamwork to very large teams. In: Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D., Alonso, E. (eds.) AAMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3394, pp. 888–895. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Schrage, D., Vachtsevanos, G.: Software enabled control for intelligent uavs. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design, Hawaii (August 1999)
Shmoys, D., Tardos, E.: An approximation algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Mathematical Programming 62, 461–474 (1993)
Singh, M.: Developing formal specifications to coordinate hetrogeneous agents. In: Proceedings of third international conference on multiagent systems, pp. 261–268 (1998)
Tambe, M.: Agent architectures for flexible, practical teamwork. In: National Conference on AI (AAAI 1997), pp. 22–28 (1997)
Tambe, M., Shen, W.-M., Mataric, M., Pynadath, D., Goldberg, D., Modi, P.J., Qiu, Z., Salemi, B.: Teamwork in cyberspace: using TEAMCORE to make agents team-ready. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on agents in cyberspace (1999)
Tidhar, G., Rao, A.S., Sonenberg, E.A.: Guided team selection. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (1996)
Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Werger, B.B., Mataric, M.J.: Broadcast of local eligibility for multi-target observation. In: Proc. of 5th Int. Symposium on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, DARS (2000)
White, T., Pagurek, B.: Towards multi swarm problem solving in networks. In: Proceedings of the International conference on multi-agent systems, Paris, July 1998, pp. 333–340 (1998)
Xu, Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Scerri, P.: Information sharing in very large teams. In: AAMAS 2004 Workshop on Challenges in Coordination of Large Scale MultiAgent Systems (2004)
Zhang, W., Wittenburg, L.: Distributed breakout revisited. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2002 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Scerri, P., Sycara, K. (2005). Challenges in Building Very Large Teams. In: Ishida, T., Gasser, L., Nakashima, H. (eds) Massively Multi-Agent Systems I. MMAS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3446. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11512073_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11512073_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26974-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31889-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)