Skip to main content

Coherent Restrictions of Vague Conditional Lower-Upper Probability Extensions

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3571))

  • 1139 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we propose a way to restrict extension bounds induced by coherent conditional lower-upper probability assessments. Such shrinkage turns out to be helpful whenever the natural bounds are too vague to be used. Since coherence of a conditional lower-upper probability assessment can be characterized through a class of conditional probability distributions, the idea is to take the intersection of the extension bounds induced by each single element of the class instead of the convex combination, as it is usually done. Coherence of such method is proved for extensions performed on both conditional events logical dependent and not-dependent on the initial domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Capotorti, A.: Generalized concept of atoms for conditional events. In: Coletti, G., et al. (eds.) Mathematical Models for Handling Partial Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 183–189. Plenum Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Capotorti, A., Fagundes Leite, S.: Reliability of GIST diagnosis based on partial information. In: Di Bacco, M., D’Amore, G., Scalfari, F. (eds.) Applied Bayesian Statistical Studies In Biology And Medicine. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Capotorti, A., Galli, L., Vantaggi, B.: How to use locally strong coherence in an inferential process based on upper-lower probabilities. Soft Computing 7(5), 280–287 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Capotorti, A., Paneni, T.: An operational view of coherent conditional previsions, in. In: Benferhat, S., Besnard, P. (eds.) ECSQARU 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2143, pp. 132–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Capotorti, A.: Benefits of embedding structural constraints in coherent diagnostic processes, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, article in press corrected proof (2004), available at http://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S0888613X04001070

  6. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Characterization of Coherent Conditional Probabilities as a Tool for their Assessment and Extension. Int. Journ. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 4(2), 103–127 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Conditional measures: old and new. In: New trends in Fuzzy Systems, pp. 107–120. World Scientific, Singapore (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Conditioning and Inference in Itelligent Systems. Soft Computing 3, 118–130 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Probabilistic Logic in a Coherent Setting. “Trends in Logic”. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Finetti, B.: Teoria della probabilità, Einaudi, Torino (Engl. transl.: Theory of Probability, vol.1&2. Wiley, Chichester (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilio, A.: Algorithms for precise and imprecise conditional probability assessments. In: Coletti, G., et al. (eds.) Mathematical Models for Handling Partial Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 231–254. Plenum Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. The International Society for Imprecise Probability Theory and Applications (eletronic versions). In: Proocedings of the International Symposia on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, http://www.sipta.org/isipta/

  13. Lad, F.: Operational Subjective Statistical Methods: a mathematical, philosophical, and historical introduction. John Wiley, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Walley, P., Pelessoni, R., Vicig, P.: Direct Algorithms for Checking Coherence and Making Inferences from Conditional Probability Assessments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 126(1), 119–151 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Capotorti, A., Zagoraiou, M. (2005). Coherent Restrictions of Vague Conditional Lower-Upper Probability Extensions. In: Godo, L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27326-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31888-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics